Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Peterson, 290 So. 2d 307.
- State of Louisiana v. Taveon Malik Leary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Craig Miller La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Andrews
265 So. 3d 1078
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Heard
258 So. 3d 875
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
- State v. Girod 195 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
-
State in the Intrest of T. H.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
However, the court explained that is not necessary: Code of Criminal Procedure Article 464 requires that the indictment be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.
-
State ex rel. T.H.
140 So. 3d 911
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
However, the court explained that is not necessary: Code of Criminal Procedure Article 464 requires that the indictment be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.
- State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
-
State v. Campbell
70 So. 3d 1024
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Furthermore, a manslaughter verdict is responsive to a second degree mur *1027 der indictment even though the record contains no evidence of “sudden passion” or “heat of blood.”
- State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
-
State v. Calhoun
974 So. 2d 805
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Haley, 38,258 (La.App.
- State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Haley 873 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
-
State v. Jordan
728 So. 2d 954
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
App.2d Cir.12/11/96), , writ denied, 97-0122 (La.5/16/97)
- State v. Anderson 714 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- State v. Evans 669 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
State v. Williams
658 So. 2d 703
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
9, citing State v. Tompkins, supra
- State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
State v. Howard
626 So. 2d 459
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
State v. Nugent
580 So. 2d 1002
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
9 Since they are mitigatory factors, a defendant who establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted in a `sudden passion' or `heat of blood' is entitled to a manslaughter verdict.10 Where such proof has been introduced, a second degree murder verdict is inappropriate."
-
State v. Campbell
562 So. 2d 37
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
3 Cir. *39 1984), writ denied, (La.App.
- State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. White 544 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Muntz 534 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- State v. Lewis 529 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Doyle 525 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State v. McCullough
503 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied
- State v. Butler 503 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Darby
502 So. 2d 274
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
the defendant was charged with murder, and the jury returned a responsive verdict of manslaughter.
- State v. Lee 498 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
-
State v. Collier
474 So. 2d 529
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
" at 310 (La.1974), the Supreme Court determined that the presence of passion is in the nature of a defense and that the additional `element' of lack of passion need not be proven by the State in a murder prosecution.
-
State v. Dill
461 So. 2d 1130
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Initially, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed the existence of provocation or "heat of blood" in a murder prosecution was in the nature of a defense rather than an element of the offense of manslaughter.
-
State v. Willis
459 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
: “If passion reduces a homicide requiring the same scienter, specific intent, from murder to a less serious crime, manslaughter, then lack of passion may realistically be seen as the additional element which elevates a manslaughter to murder.