Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Peterson, 290 So. 2d 307.

71 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Taveon Malik Leary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Craig Miller La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarrett Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Andrews 265 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Heard 258 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Tompkins , ; State v. Temple , ; State v. Peterson
  • State v. Girod 195 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    However, the court explained that is not necessary: Code of Criminal Procedure Article 464 requires that the indictment be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.
  • State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    However, the court explained that is not necessary: Code of Criminal Procedure Article 464 requires that the indictment be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.
  • State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Carper 107 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Campbell 70 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Furthermore, a manslaughter verdict is responsive to a second degree mur *1027 der indictment even though the record contains no evidence of “sudden passion” or “heat of blood.”
  • State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Tillman 7 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Calhoun 974 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Haley, 38,258 (La.App.
  • State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Haley 873 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jordan 728 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    App.2d Cir.12/11/96), , writ denied, 97-0122 (La.5/16/97)
  • State v. Anderson 714 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Evans 669 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    9, citing State v. Tompkins, supra
  • State v. Brumfield 639 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Pipkins 628 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Howard 626 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3 Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Nugent 580 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    9 Since they are mitigatory factors, a defendant who establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that he acted in a `sudden passion' or `heat of blood' is entitled to a manslaughter verdict.10 Where such proof has been introduced, a second degree murder verdict is inappropriate."
  • State v. Campbell 562 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    3 Cir. *39 1984), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Dozier 553 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. White 544 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Muntz 534 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Gibson 529 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Lewis 529 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Doyle 525 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. McCullough 503 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Butler 503 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    the defendant was charged with murder, and the jury returned a responsive verdict of manslaughter.
  • State v. Lee 498 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Montgomery 499 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106 La. 1986
  • State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    " at 310 (La.1974), the Supreme Court determined that the presence of passion is in the nature of a defense and that the additional `element' of lack of passion need not be proven by the State in a murder prosecution.
  • State v. Dill 461 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    Initially, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed the existence of provocation or "heat of blood" in a murder prosecution was in the nature of a defense rather than an element of the offense of manslaughter.
  • State v. Willis 459 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    : “If passion reduces a homicide requiring the same scienter, specific intent, from murder to a less serious crime, manslaughter, then lack of passion may realistically be seen as the additional element which elevates a manslaughter to murder.