DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC., 294 So. 2d 803.

165 citing documents.

  • Burrows v. Louisiana State Department of Highways 319 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    959 , (1967); Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
  • Townsend v. Cleve Heyl Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. 318 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    See Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
  • Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 309 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Art. 1934(3); Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., (La.S.Ct.
  • Reggans v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 308 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    In the recent case of Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, in which the Supreme Court granted writs to review a ruling of this court, it was stated: "Since the jury does have, under the law, much discretion in fixing damages, a more appropriate method of testing whether the jury had abused its discretion is to determine whether the award of the jury can be supporte
  • Armstead v. CENTRAL LA. ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 308 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    art. 1934; Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Fowler v. Gulf Insurance Company 306 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    959 , (1967), and Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
  • Levron v. Dupre 307 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., La., ; Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company, La., .
  • Peltier v. Seabird Industries, Inc. 304 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Tuminello v. Mawby, 220 La.
  • Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. 304 So. 2d 351 La. 1974
    Co., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., (La.
  • Miller v. Travelers Insurance Company 303 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    959 , (1967); and Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.
  • Alexander v. Mid-South Sweeping Service, Inc. 303 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    .” The Louisiana Supreme Court in Spillers v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc., explained the above rule as follows: “ * * * A reviewing court might well disagree with the amount of the award fixed by the jury, but it is not entitled to substitute its opinion for that of the trier of fact.
  • Gianakis v. Mayen 301 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
  • Watts v. Town of Homer 301 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • South Texas Lloyds v. Guarantee Insurance Co. 299 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    As again emphasized by the Supreme Court in Donald Ray Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. et al, bearing Nos. 54029 and 54030 (not yet reported), : “A reviewing court might well disagree with the amount of the award fixed by the jury, but it is not entitled to substitute its opinion for that of the trier of fact.
  • Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 296 So. 2d 257 La. 1974
    More recently, this Court adhered to the principles set forth in the above cited authorities in Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., , handed down by this Court on April 29, 1974; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., supra; and Walker v. Champion, supra.