Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Paciera, 290 So. 2d 681.

138 citing documents.

State v. Burton 416 So. 2d 73 La. 1982
State v. Leatherwood 411 So. 2d 29 La. 1982
State v. Clay 408 So. 2d 1295 La. 1982
*1300 Based on all of the recited facts, we are of the opinion that the "direct personal observation" by the informant, coupled with the affidavit's disclosure of the informant's name, address and Stewart's personal knowledge of this individual, sufficiently established that the named informant was credible and his information was reliable.
State v. Elliot 407 So. 2d 659 La. 1981
State v. Hernandez 408 So. 2d 911 La. 1981
725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 ] (1960)
State v. Krolowitz 407 So. 2d 1175 La. 1981
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) at 685-686 (La.1974) wherein we said: The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information giv
State v. Woods 406 So. 2d 158 La. 1981
State v. Tate 407 So. 2d 1133 La. 1981
-86 (La.1974): The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by him.
State v. Cook 404 So. 2d 1210 La. 1981
1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964)
State v. Johnson 404 So. 2d 239 La. 1981
State v. Jeffcoat 403 So. 2d 1227 La. 1981
725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)
State v. Mena 399 So. 2d 149 La. 1981
we stated: As Spinelli observed, "in judging probable cause magistrates are not to be confined by niggardly limitations or by restrictions on the use of their common sense" and "their determination of probable cause should be paid great deference by reviewing courts."
State v. Cann 392 So. 2d 381 La. 1981
725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960)
State v. Clark 391 So. 2d 1174 La. 1980
See also State v. Wright, supra; -88 (La.
State v. Wichers 392 So. 2d 419 La. 1980
-86 (La.1974): The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by him.
State v. Huff 392 So. 2d 1046 La. 1980
State v. Smith 392 So. 2d 454 La. 1980
State v. Baker 389 So. 2d 1289 La. 1980
-86 (La.1974): The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by him.
State v. Ogden 391 So. 2d 434 La. 1980
State v. Stephenson 387 So. 2d 1111 La. 1980
State v. Guidry 388 So. 2d 797 La. 1980
State v. Bible 389 So. 2d 42 La. 1980
1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964)
State v. Davis 385 So. 2d 193 La. 1980
State v. Tranum 384 So. 2d 367 La. 1980
this Court recognized the following standard to be applied in evaluating affidavits based on an informant's tip: "...
State v. Morvant 384 So. 2d 765 La. 1980
this court, following Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Matthews 382 So. 2d 917 La. 1980
State v. Tomasetti 381 So. 2d 420 La. 1980
1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964)
State v. Nelson 381 So. 2d 477 La. 1980
State v. Ragsdale 381 So. 2d 492 La. 1980
State v. Jackson 380 So. 2d 616 La. 1980
State v. Normand 380 So. 2d 1207 La. 1980
State v. Kelly 375 So. 2d 1344 La. 1979
State v. Morgan 376 So. 2d 99 La. 1979
State v. Edwards 375 So. 2d 1365 La. 1979
State v. Daniel 373 So. 2d 149 La. 1979
Summers, J., dissenting; State v. Holmes, 254 La.
State v. Rudolph 369 So. 2d 1320 La. 1979
this Court held: "If we can deduce a rule from these cases, it is this: The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliab
State v. Collins 370 So. 2d 533 La. 1979
24:171; see, State v. Kent, 262 La.
State v. Boksham 370 So. 2d 491 La. 1979
State v. Koncir 367 So. 2d 365 La. 1979
State v. Wilson 366 So. 2d 1328 La. 1978
State v. Jones 365 So. 2d 1359 La. 1978
In State v. Paciera, La., (1974), we set forth the rules for issuance of a search warrant.
State v. Matthews 366 So. 2d 1348 La. 1978
State v. Hysell 364 So. 2d 1300 La. 1978
1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964) we determine that even without the inaccurate information, the affidavit establishes probable cause.
State v. Weinberg 364 So. 2d 964 La. 1978
Consequently, -686 (La.1974).
State v. Babbitt 363 So. 2d 690 La. 1978
State v. Case 363 So. 2d 486 La. 1978
State v. Turnipseed 362 So. 2d 486 La. 1978
In fashioning guidelines for application of the rule of Aguilar and those of other United States Supreme Court cases governing determinations of the sufficiency of warrants, (La.
State v. Richards 357 So. 2d 1128 La. 1978
*1131 This court, enunciated the following rule, deduced from United States Supreme Court cases, to measure the sufficiency of a supporting affidavit which is based upon informant-supplied data: The affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstance
State v. Anderson 357 So. 2d 547 La. 1978
In State v. Paciera, La., (1974), we set forth the rules relating to the probable cause necessary for issuance of a warrant.