Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Company, 294 So. 2d 215.

55 citing documents.

Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Hubert Rougeau, Jr. v. Gottson Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Rougeau v. Gottson Construction Co. 57 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 53 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Betty Jean Pharis Morrison v. Alexandria Commons, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Morrison v. Alexandria Commons, LLC 25 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
Co., Cra wford v. Al Smith P. & H. Serv., Inc., McDill v. Utica Mut.
Louisiana Bag Co., Inc. v. Audubon Indem. Co. 999 So. 2d 1104 La. 2008
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center 805 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Kelley v. Jack Jackson Const. Co. 748 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Co., Nowlin v. Breck Construction Co., 30,622 (La.App.2d Cir.6/24/98), ; Cleveland v. Delhi Guest Home, 29,506 (La.App.2d Cir.5/7/97), 694 * (La.App.
Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. 721 So. 2d 885 La. 1998
Nowlin v. Breck Const. Co. 715 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Thibodeaux v. L.S. Womack, Inc. 653 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Thibodeaux v. LS Womack, Inc. 653 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Menard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 640 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Hopes v. Domtar Industries 627 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Zeigler v. Pleasant Manor Nursing Home 600 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Borne v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc. 595 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
22:658, which provided for penalties of 12% on the amount due by the insurer and reasonable attorney’s fees, when the failure to pay worker’s compensation insurance “is found to be arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause.” the Supreme Court found that “[T]he purpose of this penalty provision is to deter insurers from unjustified termination of payments to injured employees during the period of their distress.” And further, that “penalties should be imposed only in those instances in whi
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc. 588 So. 2d 350 La. 1991
Peck v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. 586 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Co. (La.
Lubom v. LJ Earnest, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Patton v. Mini-Togs, Inc. 575 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
and Ainsworth v. Wells Lamont Corp., supra.
Duncan v. STATE, DOTD 556 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Guidry v. BOH BROS. CONST. CO., INC. 545 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Loud v. Dixie Metal Co. 506 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.1973), rev’d on other grounds
Chance v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 509 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Alfred v. City of Eunice 503 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Co., [ ] supra.
Gales v. Gold Bond Bldg. Products 493 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
3rd Cir.1973), rev'd on other grounds, Meche v. Arthur G. McKee & Company, Inc., (La.App.
Wall v. Sisters of Charity of Incarnate Word 488 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Smith v. Ranger Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Williams v. Western Preferred Cas. Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Thibodeaux v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 454 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America 454 So. 2d 1113 La. 1984
Atlee v. Stone & Webster Engineering, Inc. 428 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Carter v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, supra
Donald v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 426 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
22:658 having to do with the penalties for failure to timely pay insurance benefits are stricti juris and are imposed in those instances where the failure to pay benefits timely is arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause
Stracener v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. 420 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
that "[i]n the event that there exists a substantial issue as to whether the disabled workman is entitled to compensation benefits, penalties should be denied."
Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. 411 So. 2d 1042 La. 1982
Collins v. McDonald's Corp. 411 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
This formulation of the trial court is consistent with the *613 (La.
Graziano v. Lallie Kemp Charity Hospital 400 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Rushing v. Insurance Co. of North America 391 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1976), writ denied
Carter v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 386 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Vickers v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 383 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
” the court stated, in reference to R.S.
Parker v. Kroger's, Inc. 382 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Richard v. Standard Fittings 379 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Lee v. National Tea Co. 378 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Whitaker v. Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corp. 357 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
and authorities therein cited.
Lopez v. Commercial Union Assurance Companies 353 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
530 , (1954); Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Company, La., (1974), and cases cited therein.
Crawford v. Al Smith P. & H. Service, Inc. 352 So. 2d 669 La. 1977
Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America 342 So. 2d 591 La. 1977
Guillory v. Travelers Insurance Co., La., (1974); Fruge v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, 226 La.