Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc., 298 So. 2d 859.

15 citing documents.

Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 788 So. 2d 1154 La. 2001
State, State, State, State
Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert 488 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Cf. State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc., (La.
Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. v. Hargrave 432 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc.
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Terrell 416 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
citing State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc.
Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene 406 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
App.1st Cir. 1980); and State, for the proposition that "All of the tools of evaluation, including the determination of highest and best use, the study of comparables, cost of structure and depreciation studies, and income analysis, are only means of fixing just and adequate compensation.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Centuries Memorial Park Ass'n 391 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
v. Terrace Land Co., Inc.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. LeBlanc 388 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Under the oft cited case of State, Department of Highways versus Terrace Land Company, Inc., (Supreme Court, 1974) and even under the earlier case of State, Department of Highways versus Patout, (Supreme Court, 1971), the defendants are clearly entitled to have the part taken considered as subdivision lots.
State Department of Highways v. Kornman 336 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
State, Department of Highways v. Terrace Land Company, Inc.
Recreation & Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Cobb 333 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
The defendant relies heavily on the decision of State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Terrace Land Company, Inc., rehearing den.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Manasco 331 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Defendants cite and rely on State, Department of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc.
State, Department of Highways v. Willet 322 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Nisbet Properties, Inc. 309 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
More recently in State, Department of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc., the Supreme Court discussed the basic task of the courts in fixing just compensation as mandated by the Constitution and the use of various formulas as follows: "The basic purpose in all cases is to determine the just and adequate compensation *401 required by our constitution.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jacobsen 306 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In State, Dept. of Highways v. Terrace Land Co., Inc., La., (decided after the trial court judgment in the present case), the Supreme Court held that Act 315 of 1970, although specifically amending only C.C.
State, Department of Highways v. Anselmo 301 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
v. Terrace Land Co., Inc., La.1974, .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc. 305 So. 2d 505 La. 1974
That question was decided favorably to the applicant in State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Terrace Land Company, Inc., , in an opinion handed down on June 10, 1974.