DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Matthews, 292 So. 2d 226.

28 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Charles D. Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “formed an inseparable part of the state’s substantial circumstantial evidence linking him to the shooting,” and because evidence of cocaine possession was “an integral part of the act or transaction that was the subject of the present proceeding.” (testimony that defendant, who was charged with armed robbery, stopped four persons and demanded their coats and when one person
  • State of Louisiana v. Theron J. Chaisson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “formed an inseparable part of the state’s substantial circumstantial evidence linking him to the shooting,” and because evidence of cocaine possession was “an integral part of the act or transaction that was the subject of the present proceeding.” (testimony that defendant, who was charged with armed robbery, stopped four persons and demanded their coats and when one person
  • State v. Chaisson 20 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    hours after the victim was last seen alive in his presence and less than two hours before her death” because the evidence, “formed an inseparable part of the state’s substantial circumstantial evidence linking him to the shooting,” and because evidence of cocaine possession was “an integral part of the act or transaction that was the subject of the present proceeding.” (testimony that defendant, who was charged with armed robbery, stopped four persons and demanded their coats and when one person
  • State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    (testimony that defendant, who was charged with armed robbery, stopped four persons and demanded their coats and when one person attempted to flee, defendant shot and killed him, demonstrated the robbery and shooting were part of a single, *1249 continuous transaction, integrated in both space and time
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    (testimony that defendant, who was charged with armed robbery, stopped four persons and demanded their coats and when one person attempted to flee, defendant shot and killed him, demonstrated the robbery and shooting were part of a single, continuous transaction, integrated in both space and time, and t
  • State v. Trosclair 691 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
    State v. Matthews, *1356
  • State v. Rudolph 369 So. 2d 1320 La. 1979
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Taylor 363 So. 2d 699 La. 1978
  • State v. Schwartz 354 So. 2d 1332 La. 1978
  • State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
  • State v. Collins 350 So. 2d 590 La. 1977
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Cobbs 350 So. 2d 168 La. 1977
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Hoffman 345 So. 2d 1 La. 1977
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Moore 344 So. 2d 973 La. 1977
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Durr 343 So. 2d 1004 La. 1977
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Ardoin 340 So. 2d 1362 La. 1976
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Phillips 337 So. 2d 1157 La. 1976
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.
  • State v. Flowers 337 So. 2d 469 La. 1976
  • State v. McCoy 337 So. 2d 192 La. 1976
    State v. Whitsell, 262 La.
  • State v. Kaufman 331 So. 2d 16 La. 1976
    15:447, 15:448; State v. Jefferson, supra .
  • State v. Powell 325 So. 2d 791 La. 1976
    As we stated in State v. Matthews, La., (1974): "The record is clear that the robbery.
  • State ex rel. Matthews v. Henderson 320 So. 2d 203 La. 1975
    Allegations by petitioner have been adversely decided against him either in his prior appeal (La., ) or on prior writ application.
  • State v. Major 318 So. 2d 19 La. 1975
    The shooting occurred during the actual robbery; it was a part of the crime and inextricably connected to the crime charged, therefore, it was admissible as part of the res gestae.
  • State v. Johnson 294 So. 2d 229 La. 1974
    State v. Edwards, 261 La.