Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 305 So. 2d 457.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Carlos Washington La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
However, under the criminal code, whether a sanity commission was convened to evaluate Defendant’s mental condition at the time of the offense was within the sound discretion of the district court; (La.
State v. Miller 964 So. 2d 911 La. 2007
1051, 1060 , (1970) (Article 561 was enacted to obviate the practice of dilatory tactics by defendants in criminal cases.); ( on reh'g ) (The purpose of the statutory time limits was to give the prosecution adequate notice of a defendant's intention to advance an insanity defense and adequate time to prepare in the face of such a defense.); (La.App.
State v. Mercer 564 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
1532 , 36 L.Ed.2d 192 (1973); -463 (La.1974).
State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
Over the objection of his counsel, the court permitted defendant to withdraw his dual plea and enter a plea of "not guilty,"
State v. Leonard 394 So. 2d 1214 La. 1981
State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
State v. Lighten 367 So. 2d 372 La. 1979
State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
In State v. Clark, La., (1974), we stated that a plea of "`not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity' is tantamount to an alternative admission of the criminal conduct."
State v. Willie 360 So. 2d 813 La. 1978
State v. Burge 359 So. 2d 616 La. 1978
A wherein this Court held that a defendant may "withdraw the dual plea and substitute the single plea of `not guilty' at any time prior to the presentment of the indictment and defendant's responsive plea to the jury."
State v. Rollins 351 So. 2d 470 La. 1977
State v. Marmillion 339 So. 2d 788 La. 1976
art. 652; State v. Toon, 172 La.
State v. Davenport 340 So. 2d 251 La. 1976
The argument is made that the "situation"

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by