Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Medlock, 297 So. 2d 190.

29 citing documents.

State v. Knighten 968 So. 2d 720 La. 2007
."); ("The very relevant evidence of the other [prior drug sales to an undercover agent] was of great probative value in establishing the essential ingredient of the crime-intent to distribute")(footnote omitted); (state properly charged four counts of
State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
In support of its ruling
State v. Jones 537 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Robertson, supra
State v. Robertson 509 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hills 498 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Jordan 489 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Prudholm 446 So. 2d 729 La. 1984
State v. Turner, supra at 1354
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
State v. Grey 408 So. 2d 1239 La. 1982
State v. Turner 365 So. 2d 1352 La. 1978
State v. Thibodeaux, supra
State v. Harvey 358 So. 2d 1224 La. 1978
we set forth the general rule relating to such allegations by stating that "defendants' bare allegation that a joint trial would deprive them of the right to call the co-defendants as witnesses" is not of itself a sufficient ground to grant a severance.
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
State v. Carter 352 So. 2d 607 La. 1977
State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
State v. Singleton 352 So. 2d 191 La. 1977
State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
State v. Elzie 343 So. 2d 712 La. 1977
State v. Slayton 338 So. 2d 694 La. 1976
concerned prosecution for possession with intent to distribute drugs which had been seized a few minutes after they arrived at the defendant's home in the mails; the other offenses were admissible to prove the requisite intent to distribute of the undoubted possession.
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 1339 La. 1976
State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
[citations omitted] a case also involving a charge of possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, wherein we stated: .
State v. Finley 341 So. 2d 381 La. 1976
Moreover, we note that even construing the motion as one to sever as argued by defendants in brief, defendants' contention that a joint trial of defendants with and without criminal records would prejudice the defendants without records and therefore warrant a severance.
State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
State v. Shaffer, 260 La.
Distinguished State v. Clark 338 So. 2d 690 La. 1976
State v. Sims 329 So. 2d 722 La. 1976
State v. Thomas 319 So. 2d 789 La. 1975
Distinguished State v. Banks 307 So. 2d 594 La. 1975
( is distinguishable: Medlock involved a conviction for possession with the intent to distribute, while the instant charge is distribution of heroin).
Followed State v. Glover 304 So. 2d 348 La. 1974
State v. Taylor 303 So. 2d 169 La. 1974