Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Stewart, 301 So. 2d 872.

13 citing documents.

Succession of Cladie J. Wade La. 2025
Succession Of Cladie J. Wade La. 2021
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Howard v. Adm'rs of Tulane Educ. Fund 970 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Succession of Neff 716 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In Re Guidry Trust 713 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Likewise, no Louisiana case ( and St.
Succession of Merritt 581 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Matter of Succession of Farr 421 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
They urge that in the case of the court held that the bequest to a trustee is not made to it as owner or as beneficiary but rather "in trust" subject to the trust instrument.
Reynolds v. Reynolds 388 So. 2d 1135 La. 1980
Likewise, no Louisiana case ( [La.1974] and St.
Succession of Bel 377 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[5] See, for example, Succession of Stewart, La., ; Giroir v. Dumesnil, 248 La.
Reynolds v. Reynolds 365 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
1st Cir. 1965) expressed disagreement with these pronouncements, but we find such pronouncements to be persuasive, especially in light of our Supreme Court's decision in (La.
Succession of Burgess 359 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
In the court reviewed all of this jurisprudence in deciding that a disposition in trust was not a prohibited substitution and concluded: ".
Distinguished Succession of Hines 341 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
The residuary legatees argue that the case of holds that the beneficiary and particular legatee of a testamentary trust are one and the same person.