Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Ponder, 340 So. 2d 134.

17 citing documents.

  • In Re Cook 33 So. 3d 155 La. 2010
  • In Re Wittenbrink 849 So. 2d 18 La. 2003
    552 (1882); on rehearing ; Code of Professional Responsibility supra, Ethical Consideration 1-1.
  • In re Laudumiey 849 So. 2d 515 La. 2003
    See also Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, (on rehearing).
  • In re Gaudin 785 So. 2d 763 La. 2001
    Compare Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, with O’Halloran, supra.
  • In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Meyer 478 So. 2d 1211 La. 1985
    Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Heymann, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wilson 477 So. 2d 718 La. 1985
    Although the U.S. Supreme Court Rules were amended in 1980, the effect of the amendment in Rules 51 and 52 was not to change the old U.S. Supreme Court Rule 58
  • State v. Summit 466 So. 2d 451 La. 1985
    U.S. Supreme Court Rule 51; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Karst 428 So. 2d 406 La. 1983
    appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. O'HALLORAN 412 So. 2d 523 La. 1982
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Heymann 405 So. 2d 826 La. 1981
    No. 60,464; appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Levy 400 So. 2d 1355 La. 1981
    Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Quaid, supra ; appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Miller 382 So. 2d 911 La. 1980
    Compare Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, and Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Jones, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Adams, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Stinson
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Bensabat 378 So. 2d 380 La. 1979
    552 (1882); on rehearing ; Code of Professional Responsibility supra, Ethical Consideration 1-1.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Orrett 355 So. 2d 253 La. 1978
    That Neville Glenn Orrett respectfully suggests that as this Court held in the case of Louisiana State Bar Association v. Ponder, La., (1976), a ninety (90) day suspension from the practice of law is appropriate discipline for the activity which resulted in Mr. Orrett’s conviction.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. McSween 347 So. 2d 1118 La. 1977
    *1121 Respondent notes that the criminal charges did not arise out of his law practice and urges that, in reaching a decision as to the appropriate disciplinary action, that "a disciplinary action is not so much for the punishment of the attorney as it is for the preservation of the integrity of the courts and the salutary effect it has upon other members of the bar."
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Shaheen 338 So. 2d 1347 La. 1976