Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Ponder, 340 So. 2d 134.
- In Re Cook 33 So. 3d 155 La. 2010
-
In Re Wittenbrink
849 So. 2d 18
La. 2003
552 (1882); on rehearing ; Code of Professional Responsibility supra, Ethical Consideration 1-1.
-
In re Laudumiey
849 So. 2d 515
La. 2003
See also Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, (on rehearing).
-
In re Gaudin
785 So. 2d 763
La. 2001
Compare Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, with O’Halloran, supra.
- In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Meyer
478 So. 2d 1211
La. 1985
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Heymann, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
-
State v. Wilson
477 So. 2d 718
La. 1985
Although the U.S. Supreme Court Rules were amended in 1980, the effect of the amendment in Rules 51 and 52 was not to change the old U.S. Supreme Court Rule 58
-
State v. Summit
466 So. 2d 451
La. 1985
U.S. Supreme Court Rule 51; Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Karst
428 So. 2d 406
La. 1983
appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. O'HALLORAN 412 So. 2d 523 La. 1982
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Heymann
405 So. 2d 826
La. 1981
No. 60,464; appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Levy
400 So. 2d 1355
La. 1981
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Quaid, supra ; appeal dismissed 431 U.S. 934 , 97 S.Ct.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Miller
382 So. 2d 911
La. 1980
Compare Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Ponder, and Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Jones, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Adams, Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Stinson
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Bensabat
378 So. 2d 380
La. 1979
552 (1882); on rehearing ; Code of Professional Responsibility supra, Ethical Consideration 1-1.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Orrett
355 So. 2d 253
La. 1978
That Neville Glenn Orrett respectfully suggests that as this Court held in the case of Louisiana State Bar Association v. Ponder, La., (1976), a ninety (90) day suspension from the practice of law is appropriate discipline for the activity which resulted in Mr. Orrett’s conviction.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. McSween
347 So. 2d 1118
La. 1977
*1121 Respondent notes that the criminal charges did not arise out of his law practice and urges that, in reaching a decision as to the appropriate disciplinary action, that "a disciplinary action is not so much for the punishment of the attorney as it is for the preservation of the integrity of the courts and the salutary effect it has upon other members of the bar."
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Shaheen 338 So. 2d 1347 La. 1976