Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sears, 298 So. 2d 814.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State v. Dennis 72 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, State v. Mack, 43,206 (La.App.
State v. MacK 981 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson 926 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See State v. Major, La., (1975); State v. Watson, La., (1974); State v. Sears, La., (1974); State v. Lawrence, La., (1974); State v. McLeod, La., (1973); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
State v. Williams 688 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Wilson 677 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
1985), where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: It is true that a defendant has a right to be arraigned.
State v. Wilson 635 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Kimble 546 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Clark 466 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
the accused was charged with murder.
State v. Bessard 461 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "It is true every defendant has a right to be arraigned.
State v. Freeman 461 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
A failure to arraign the defendant or the fact that he did not plead, is waived if the defendant enters upon the trial without objecting thereto, and it shall be considered as if he had pleaded not guilty.” where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *498 “It is true that a defendant has a right to be arraigned.
State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Young 443 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Mitchell 421 So. 2d 851 La. 1982
2408 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978)
State v. White 404 So. 2d 1202 La. 1981
State v. Day 391 So. 2d 1147 La. 1980
State v. Cripps, 259 La.
State v. Lovett 345 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
State v. Glover 343 So. 2d 118 La. 1977
State v. Simpson, 247 La.
State v. Vincent 338 So. 2d 1376 La. 1976
State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
See State v. Major, La., (1975); State v. Watson, La., (1974); State v. Sears, La., (1974); State v. Lawrence, La., (1974); State v. McLeod, La., (1973); State v. Daniels, 262 La.
State v. Cole 337 So. 2d 1067 La. 1976
654 (1921); State v. Comeaux, 252 La.
State v. Strange 334 So. 2d 182 La. 1976
See, e.g., State v. Sears, La., (1974).
State v. Tucker 332 So. 2d 797 La. 1976
State v. Mims 330 So. 2d 905 La. 1976
State v. Rogers, supra ; State v. Comeaux, 252 La.
State v. Luckett 327 So. 2d 365 La. 1976
State v. Stevenson 323 So. 2d 762 La. 1975
State v. Rogers 324 So. 2d 403 La. 1975
State v. Comeaux, 252 La.
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State v. Daniels, 262 La.
State v. Neal 321 So. 2d 497 La. 1975
State v. Ross 320 So. 2d 177 La. 1975
State v. Walton, 179 La.
State v. Nicholas 319 So. 2d 361 La. 1975
[7] Defendant could have testified, with his examination and cross-examination being limited to the comprehension and voluntariness issue, and without such testimony being available for use at the trial on the merits.
State v. Hines 319 So. 2d 313 La. 1975
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 864 (1973)
State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
See State v. Sears, La., (1974).