DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 298 So. 2d 777.

24 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Asahel Harvin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Harvin 239 So. 3d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Jackson , , 780 (La.1974).
  • State v. Comeaux 239 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Jackson , , 780 (La.1974).
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    As this court explained in State v. Vincent, the Court reasoned that the “(bill of) information [charging the defendant as a multiple offender] does not charge a crime but is merely the method of informing the sentencing court of the circumstances and requesting an enhancement of penalty.” Thus, the enhanced penalty proceeding does not charge the defe
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    the Court reasoned that the “(bill of) information [charging the defendant as a multiple offender] does not charge a crime but is merely the method of informing the sentencing court of the circumstances and requesting an enhancement of penalty.” Thus, the enhanced penalty proceeding does not charge the defe
  • State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Court reasoned that the “(bill of) information [charging the defendant as a multiple offender] does not charge a crime but is merely the method of informing the sentencing court of the circumstances and requesting an enhancement of penalty.” Thus, the enhanced penalty proceeding does not charge the defe
  • State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Court reasoned that the “(bill of) information [charging the defendant as a *415 multiple offender] does not charge a crime but is merely the method of informing the sentencing court of the circumstances and requesting an enhancement of penalty.” Thus, the enhanced penalty proceeding does not charge the
  • State v. Cass 17 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Myles 894 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Rome 696 So. 2d 976 La. 1997
  • State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    We are compelled to vacate our previous order in Writ No. K-2759
  • State v. Bennett 544 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Holmes 504 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Dufrene 488 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Walker 416 So. 2d 534 La. 1982
  • State v. Langendorfer 389 So. 2d 1271 La. 1980
  • State v. Hill 340 So. 2d 309 La. 1976
    State v. Willie Alexander, Jr.
  • State v. Sanders 337 So. 2d 1131 La. 1976
  • State v. Ricks 329 So. 2d 684 La. 1976
  • State v. Walker 328 So. 2d 87 La. 1976
    State v. Williams, supra
  • State v. Maduell 326 So. 2d 820 La. 1976
  • State v. Alexander 325 So. 2d 777 La. 1976