Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Babin, 319 So. 2d 367.

27 citing documents.

Louisiana State Board of Nursing v. Gautreaux 39 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
44:3 does not create a privilege exempting law enforcement records from production for court purposes { ).
Malone v. Shyne 937 So. 2d 343 La. 2006
(quoting Black's Law Dictionary (4th ed.1951) as follows: "Reprieve: `The withdrawing of a sentence of death for an interval of time, whereby the execution is suspended.
State v. Leeming 612 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In determining what constitutes a "statement" by a witness
State v. Horton 487 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State ex rel. Milby v. State 471 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Gabriel 450 So. 2d 611 La. 1984
State v. Banks 446 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Davenport 399 So. 2d 201 La. 1981
Said the court: "Use of an in camera examination by the trial court to determine whether a (1975).
State v. Toledano 391 So. 2d 817 La. 1980
2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); [3] Tate, J., concurring
State v. Sylvester 388 So. 2d 1155 La. 1980
Use of an in camera examination by the trial court to determine whether a witness' prior statement is inconsistent with his trial testimony so as to entitle the defense to access to the statement was also suggested in the concurring opinion in State v. Babin, *1160 (1975).
State v. Jefferson 379 So. 2d 1389 La. 1980
it was held that instructions explaining the consequences of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity must be given if requested by defendant or by the jurors.
State v. Gurley 376 So. 2d 110 La. 1979
defendant requested the trial judge read to the jury La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Lovett 359 So. 2d 163 La. 1978
1070 , (1970), defendant Lovett was due production of the prior statement to police made by state witness John Jensen, came in a majority opinion which at best bore the assent of only two justices of the Court and at worst had no value at all because the judgment was reversed on rehearing on other grounds.
State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
State v. Bennett 345 So. 2d 1129 La. 1977
p. 485) The defendant asserts that State v. Babin, La., (1975), requires the inclusion of the full text of Articles 654, 655, and 657 in the general charge.
State v. Banks 341 So. 2d 394 La. 1976
See, (Tate, J., concurring); G. Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law, 686-88 (1974).
State v. Unzueta 337 So. 2d 1102 La. 1976
State v. Watkins 340 So. 2d 235 La. 1976
we held that "when the trial judge was not included in the general charge instruction explaining or quoting the law applicable to a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, then upon defendant's request he must read the defendant's wholly applicable, wholly correct suggested charge to the jury.
State v. Bolton 337 So. 2d 446 La. 1976
(See the concurring opinion of my brother Tate, joined in by Justice Barham and author herein, (La.
State v. Babin 336 So. 2d 780 La. 1976
On remand after reversal of a previous conviction, the defendant was convicted of armed robbery, La.R.S.
State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
A majority of this court has held that the trial court is not required to charge the jury as to the sentence-effects of verdicts, nor as to the consequences of an acquittal on the ground of insanity, (decided February 24, 1975).
State v. Beckert 326 So. 2d 494 La. 1976
will be subject to reversal by this retroactive decree.
State v. Berry 324 So. 2d 822 La. 1975
Cf. State v. Babin, La., (1975).
State v. Scott 320 So. 2d 538 La. 1975
NOTES [1] In concurring to the court's opinion on original hearing in State v. Babin, La., , the writer noted scholarly criticism of this jurisprudence and suggested it should be re-evaluated.
State v. Whitehurst 319 So. 2d 907 La. 1975
See concurring opinion in State v. Babin, La., .
State v. Foret 315 So. 2d 278 La. 1975
But cf. State v. Babin, La., presently pending on rehearing.