Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bitoun v. Landry, 302 So. 2d 278.

200 citing documents.

Chatelain v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. 495 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Browning v. Commercial Union Ins.
Olivier v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 499 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Bonner v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1976); Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Labit v. Setiff 489 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
As this court stated in Bitoun v. Landry, supra [ ]: `...
Hefner v. BJ McAdams, Inc. 487 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Bosio v. National Tea Co. 485 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Wolfshohl v. Boudreaux 482 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
: "The question is not whether a different award might have been more appropriate, but whether the award of the trial court can be reasonably supported by the evidence and justifiable inferences from the evidence before it.
Dotson v. Matthews 480 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Malmay v. Sizemore 474 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra; Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Johnson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 476 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Davis v. Allstate Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Daniels v. Allstate Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
App. 3rd Cir.1975)], supra; Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Dubois v. State Through Dept. of Pub. Safety 466 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Norris v. Pool Well Service, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
3rd Cir. 1976), reversed as to quantum, (La.
Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra ; Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem. Co. 452 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Schweiger v. Sanders 449 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Anderson v. Welding Testing Labatory, Inc., [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Conner v. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. 446 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Burnham v. Frey-Shoemaker-Colbert-Brodnax 445 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Black v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
Davila v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 444 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Larson v. Huskey 440 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Spillers v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc., [ ], supra.
Smith v. Jones 432 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
DiBenedetto v. Stark 428 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
That such evidence might also support a greater (or smaller) award will not justify a change in the amount by the appellate court.’ Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra at 279.
Alexander v. Leger 423 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [ ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Liner v. City of Houma 423 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Holmes v. Texaco, Inc. 422 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Monnier v. Boutte 420 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Spillers v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc. [ ], supra.
Faulk v. Cagle Supply, Inc. 412 So. 2d 1020 La. 1982
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [La., ] supra; Bitoun v. Landry, [La., ] supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [La., ] supra, Walker v. Champion, [La., ] supra.
Green v. Farmers Ins. Co. 412 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
As this court stated in Bitoun v. Landry, supra [ ]: "...
Black v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 411 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lawrence v. Grant Parish School Bd. 409 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Jones v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. 410 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc. [ ], supra; Bitoun v. Landry [ ], supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Augustine v. Dickenson 406 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra, [ ]; Bitoun v. Landry, supra, [ ]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Batiste v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 401 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra [ ]; Bitoun v. Landry, supra [ ]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Provost v. A. E. Gravois & Sons, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bitoun v. Landry, supra at 279 [ , La.1974].” *1291 And also in Reck v. Stevens, supra p. 501 , the Supreme Court quoted from its prior decisions as follows: “Thus, the initial inquiry must always be directed at whether the trier court’s award for the particular injuries and their effects upon this particular injured person is, a clear abuse of the t
Erdey v. Steib 392 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Bitoun v. Landry, La.App., (1974).
Placide v. Jay 378 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ” our Supreme Court states: In the event the appellate court finds from the record an abuse of discretion, the award may be disturbed by lowering it to the highest point which is reasonably within the discretion afforded the trier of fact.
Philippe v. Browning Arms Co. 375 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Dupree v. Pechinay Saint Gobain Co. 369 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra ; Bitoun v. Landry, [ ] supra.; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Ehrhardt v. Cummins 369 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., , supra; , supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Meadoux v. Hall 369 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Clofort v. Matmoor, Inc. 370 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., supra; Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
Talluto v. Patchen 370 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Wilson v. Magee 367 So. 2d 314 La. 1979
Carollo v. Wilson, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Dupree v. Long 366 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Lanclos v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 366 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
959 , (1967); and restated in a number of cases since, including these: Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins.
Smith v. Government Employees Insurance 358 So. 2d 1289 La. 1978
Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., [La., (1974)]; Bitoun v. Landry, [La., (1974)]; Fox v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
St. Martin v. Maryland Casualty Co. 357 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Only when the trial court abuses its broad discretion should the award be adjusted, either up or down.” Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc., supra