Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vince, 305 So. 2d 916.

54 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Desmond Carter La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. George D. Lowdins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lowdins 229 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
art. 644 a number of times since 1974 to modify the particulars of the appointive process, that “[s]election of physicians to serve on a sanity commission rests within sound discretion of the trial judge” still remains.
State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 644 a number of times since 1974 to modify the particulars of the appointive process, that “[selection of physicians to serve on a sanity commission rests within sound discretion of the trial judge” still remains.
State v. Hills 761 So. 2d 516 La. 2000
State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. McArthur 702 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Crawford 672 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Dailey 607 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Ritchie 556 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
the court dealt with a similar situation in which defendant argued that a mistrial should have been granted because the jury had been allowed to see certain evidence when the clerk was removing objects from a cardboard box.
State v. Spooner 550 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Bullock 476 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
7 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “Absent a showing that the jurors discussed the case among themselves, there *1014 exists no prejudicial error and hence, no grounds for a new trial.
State v. Simpson 464 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Moore 440 So. 2d 134 La. 1983
State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
State v. Walters 408 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
State v. Garrison 400 So. 2d 874 La. 1981
State v. Landry 384 So. 2d 786 La. 1980
State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
State v. Kirsch 363 So. 2d 429 La. 1978
State v. Vince, La., (1974); State v. Isaac, 261 La.
State v. Atkins 360 So. 2d 1341 La. 1978
[2] State v. Bailey, 261 La.
State v. Showers 359 So. 2d 104 La. 1978
State v. Nelson 357 So. 2d 1100 La. 1978
State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
(four days apart at the same location); (series of five robberies, within three weeks, of drivers for certain beverage distributor; (three weeks apart in same general area); (sixteen days apart on same street).
State v. Frentz 354 So. 2d 1007 La. 1978
State v. Jackson 352 So. 2d 195 La. 1977
State v. Provost 352 So. 2d 661 La. 1977
State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
State v. Smith 350 So. 2d 1178 La. 1977
The information's reliability may be established by (1) the informant's personal observation, State v. Harris, La., (1977); State v. Culotta, La., (1976); State v. Paciera, supra, or (2) the recitation of the facts upon which the informant based his conclusion, State v. Sierra, supra; State v. Vince, La., (1974).
State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
State v. Ford 349 So. 2d 300 La. 1977
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
State v. Vince, La., (1974); State v. Cloud, 246 La.
State v. Stuart 344 So. 2d 1006 La. 1977
State v. Chenier 343 So. 2d 177 La. 1977
1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
State v. Tassin 343 So. 2d 681 La. 1977
(1974), quoting United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Manale 341 So. 2d 883 La. 1977
In State v. Vince, La., (1974), we stated: *884 “The decisions of the United States Supreme Court announce the principle that the showing [in the affidavit supporting the application for a search warrant] must contain sufficient underlying facts and circumstances to enable the magistrate to review them and make the essential probable-cause d
State v. Gaines 340 So. 2d 1294 La. 1977
State v. May 339 So. 2d 764 La. 1976
State v. Otis 339 So. 2d 343 La. 1976
State v. Skelton 340 So. 2d 256 La. 1976
State v. Sharp 338 So. 2d 654 La. 1976
State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
State v. Waddles 336 So. 2d 810 La. 1976
State v. Huizar 332 So. 2d 449 La. 1976
See, e.g., State v. Nelson, La., (1975); State v. Vince, La., (1975).
State v. Shepherd 332 So. 2d 228 La. 1976
State v. Governor 331 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
State v. Woods 327 So. 2d 405 La. 1976
State v. Luckett 327 So. 2d 365 La. 1976
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State v. Rose, supra ; State v. Bourg, supra ; State v. Brown, supra .