Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pace, 301 So. 2d 323.

30 citing documents.

Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 2/24/16), (Tobias, J., dissenting) (footnote omitted); (La.
State v. Free 643 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Herrin 562 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Stukes 552 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the trial court questioned the five-year-old witness as to her ability to recognize the truth and her knowledge of the consequences of not telling the truth.
State v. Bennett 549 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Burt 546 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Racca 525 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Anderson 526 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Taplette 519 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Gray, supra; (La.App.
State v. Busch 515 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Yochim 496 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
C. McCormick, Evidence § 297 *599 (3d ed. 1984); 6 J. Wigmore, Evidence §§ 1760-1761 (Chadbourn rev. 1976); Comment, Excited Utterances and Present Sense Impressions as Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule in Louisiana, 29 La.L.Rev.
Watermeier v. Watermeier 462 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
1070 , State v. Richie, supra , [six years old].
State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Casimier 454 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the trial court questioned the five-year-old witness on her ability to recognize the truth and her knowledge of the consequences of not telling the truth.
State v. Garay 453 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Anderson 450 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Peters 441 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the court held that a formal oath is not always a prerequisite to the receipt of testimony by young *408 children.
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Adams 394 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
State v. Hatcher 372 So. 2d 1024 La. 1979
State v. Thompson 364 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
State v. Milford, 225 La.
State v. Noble 342 So. 2d 170 La. 1977
State v. Sharp 338 So. 2d 654 La. 1976
State v. Francis 337 So. 2d 487 La. 1976
State v. Terregano 336 So. 2d 859 La. 1976
In State v. Pace, La., (1974), we held similar evidence admissible under the res gestae doctrine as well as under a special exception to the hearsay rule relating to the original complaint of a sex-offense victim.
State v. Johanson 332 So. 2d 270 La. 1976
State v. Comeaux 319 So. 2d 897 La. 1975
See, e. g., State v. Pace, La., (1974); State v. Morgan, La., (1974) and the authorities therein cited.
State v. Brown 302 So. 2d 290 La. 1974
The Court recently disposed of this identical issue in State v. Pace, La., (1974).