Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board, 317 So. 2d 576.

74 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Guste v. BOARD OF COM'RS, ETC. 456 So. 2d 605 La. 1984
Const. Art. 9, § 3 (1974); (La.
Odessa House v. Goss 453 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Guste v. Simoni, Heck and Associates, Gulf Oil Corp. v. State Mineral Board, on rehearing, Foster v. Breaux, 263 La.
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. La. Environ. Cont. Com'n 452 So. 2d 1152 La. 1984
art. IX § 3; (1975) (on rehearing).
Terrebonne v. South Lafourche Tidal Control 445 So. 2d 1221 La. 1984
MacOn v. Costa 437 So. 2d 806 La. 1983
[13] Although repeals by implication are not favored, Liter v. City of Baton Rouge, 258 La.
Bethard v. State, Through Bd. of Trustees 430 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In re Appeal of Brisset 424 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Rodriguez v. Brown & Root, Inc. 410 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Exceptions to this principle are laws which are (1) interpretative ( (2) remedial or curative ( (La.App.
Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. State Mineral Board 398 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1974), and therein ultimately the Supreme Court, in amended, and as amended, affirmed the judgment of this court.
Barron v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY LICENSE CONTROL 397 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Addressing the subject of interpretive legislation, pointed out: "...
Ramsey River Road Property Owners Ass'n v. Reeves 387 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Smith v. Dixie Oil Co., 156 La.
Bordelon v. Bordelon 381 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
on rehearing: "[11] Moreover, interpretive legislation cannot properly be said to divest vested rights, because, under civilian theory, such legislation does not violate the principle of non-retroactivity of laws.
Wheeler v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, ETC. 377 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Miller v. Board of Directors of the Firemen's Pension & Relief Fund 378 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Exceptions to this principle are laws which are (1) interpretative ( (2) remedial or curative ( (La.App.
Breaux v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Traders, however, in support of the proposition that La.R.S.
Manual v. American Indem. Co. 368 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Southeastern argues, however, (La.1975, (La.
Hero Lands Co. v. Board of Commissioners 366 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 360 So. 2d 1331 La. 1978
1 M. Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law, § 251 at 179 (La.State L.Inst.
Alexander v. Alexander 357 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
recognized that a controversy exists over whether a *1263 good faith possessor is entitled to oil and gas lease royalties: "There is some controversy as to whether mineral royalties are to be treated as fruits entitling a good faith possessor to retain them against the true owner.
Green v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 352 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Exceptions to this principle are laws which are (1) interpretative ( (2) remedial or curative ( (La.
Duer & Taylor v. BLANCHARD, WALKER, ETC. 354 So. 2d 192 La. 1978
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board, on rehearing, State v. Stewart Bros. Cotton Co., Inc., 193 La.
Parish National Bank v. Blair 351 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Guillot v. Guillot 346 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Statutes of prescription must be strictly construed, : "[I]t must be presumed to have been adopted by a legislature aware that the provision would be strictly construed.
Barnett v. Barnett 339 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977