Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Michelli, 301 So. 2d 577.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Vernon Leon Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Comment, The Co-Conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule The Limits of Its Logic, 37 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Cox 876 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Comment, The Co-Conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule The Limits of Its Logic, 37 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Cage 583 So. 2d 1125 La. 1991
  • State v. Jeansonne 567 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Horne 536 So. 2d 1224 La. 1989
  • State v. Sams 487 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    ” , at page 420 (La.1980).
  • State v. McKoin 485 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ester 458 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    See also, State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Gutter, supra; State v. Hogan, 3 La.Ann.
  • State v. Dupre 408 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
    Nevertheless, (dealing with an unrelated issue), there is some danger that trial judges and lawyers, being practical men and women, may misread a rather consistent application of "harmless error" principles to certain types of erroneous rulings involving misconduct as tacit approval by this court of such practices.
  • State v. Sayles 395 So. 2d 695 La. 1981
    [3] mere warnings of error by this court are often ignored, and the failure to reverse frequently prompts repetition of the error.
  • State v. McMahon 391 So. 2d 1120 La. 1980
  • State v. Gibson 391 So. 2d 421 La. 1980
  • State v. Denis 384 So. 2d 419 La. 1980
  • State v. Dupree 377 So. 2d 328 La. 1979
    Comment, The Co-Conspirator Exception to the Hearsay Rule—The Limits of Its Logic, 37 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Lemelle 353 So. 2d 1312 La. 1977
  • State v. Green 315 So. 2d 763 La. 1975
  • State v. Hammler 312 So. 2d 306 La. 1975
    art. 703(A), supra, the defendant was entitled to a hearing on the motion to determine if his constitutional rights had been violated; failure to order such a
  • State v. Murphy 309 So. 2d 134 La. 1975
    In two recent decisions, we held that this provision prevents our application of the federal harmless error rule to errors which occur at trial.
  • State v. Ivy 307 So. 2d 587 La. 1975
    [1] and State v. Johnny Ray Herman, 304 So.
  • State v. Moore 305 So. 2d 532 La. 1975
  • State v. Hodgeson 305 So. 2d 421 La. 1974
    this court, decided October 11, 1974.
  • State v. Herman 304 So. 2d 322 La. 1974
    Louisiana Supreme Court Docket No. 54820.