DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nethken v. Nethken, 307 So. 2d 563.

73 citing documents.

  • Delatte v. Delatte 358 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Languirand v. Languirand 350 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
  • Sawyer v. Sawyer 348 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In making an initial determination of custody, the following principles, (La.
  • Shows v. Shows 345 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
  • Crowe v. Crowe 344 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In determining the propriety of a judgment awarding custody we are guided by the following principles, : “Universal and fundamental principles of the law support the proposition that the paramount consideration in custody cases is always the welfare of the child.
  • Lee v. Lee 343 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Nethken v. Nethken, La., (1975).
  • Hatch v. Hatch 341 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Patorno v. Schillaci 339 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Nethkin v. Nethkin, La.S.Ct., (1975), Fulmer (supra).
  • Franklin v. Franklin 338 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    in which the Supreme Court stated: "Notwithstanding the wife's paramount right over the husband to the custody of the young children, this right must give way to still another more paramount right—the best interest of the children themselves."
  • Amer. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Marbane Investments, Inc. 337 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    : "It is otherwise in the case of a judgment rendered against an unrepresented incompetent, a defendant not served or appearing or against whom a judgment by default has not been taken, or by a court without jurisdiction of the subject matter.
  • Miller v. Miller 336 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Marie v. Doucette 328 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Sharpe v. Sharpe 328 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    and Fulco v. Fulco, 259 La.
  • Bourque v. Leger 322 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Brackman v. Brackman 322 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
  • Lynn v. Lynn 316 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Wilson v. Wilson 317 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The power to resolve this problem resides with the Legislature and not with the courts.” is very similar to the instant matter, and we quote a portion of that opinion: “Having found the judgment of separation to be immune from collateral attack, it is necessary to consider the issue of the alternative claim of the wife for alimony after divorce on the ground that she has not sufficient means for
  • Lagrone v. Lagrone 311 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    See Comment, The Father's Right to Child Custody In Interparental Disputes, 49 Tul.L.Rev.
  • DeCelle v. DeCelle 313 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    20 , (1972); Carmichael v. Carmichael, 265 So.2d
  • Swann v. Young 311 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    The doctrine of Decker v. Landry, supra, (La.
  • Bryan v. Bryan 311 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    See Comment, The Father’s Right To Child Custody In Interparental Disputes, 49 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Bryant v. Bryant 310 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    2d 903 (La.1974), hold that determination of marital fault in the separation proceedings bars relitigation of the fault issue for purposes of an award of alimony following the final divorce on the ground *649 of no reconciliation.
  • Berry v. Berry 307 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975