Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McKinney, 302 So. 2d 917.

13 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Stacy Tyrone Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
and Johnson v. McCaughtry, 92 F.3d 585 (7th Cir. 1996), cert.
State v. Huntley 438 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In Jones, supra at 531, 532 , the Court commented: "Although we have consistently held that the action to be taken in the face of a violation of a sequestration order rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge, the discretion in this regard is not unlimited.
State v. Wilson 360 So. 2d 166 La. 1978
State v. Mullins, supra ; State v. Ardoin, supra ; State v. Batts, supra
State v. Jones 354 So. 2d 530 La. 1978
Although we have consistently held that the action to be taken in the face of a violation of a sequestration order rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge, the discretion in this regard is not unlimited.
State v. Mullins 353 So. 2d 243 La. 1977
State v. Ardoin, supra ; State v. Batts, supra
State v. Sullivan 352 So. 2d 649 La. 1977
State v. Bell 346 So. 2d 1090 La. 1977
State v. Ardoin 340 So. 2d 1362 La. 1976
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
State v. Badon 338 So. 2d 665 La. 1976
State v. Batts, La., (1975); State v. Holmes, La., (1974); State v. McKinney, La., (1974); State v. Bradford, La., (1974); State v. Browning, La., (1974); State v. Lewis, La., (1974).
State v. Batts 324 So. 2d 415 La. 1975
State v. Morgan 315 So. 2d 632 La. 1975
State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 528 La. 1975
In State v. McKinney, La., (1974), this court held that the group of prospective jurors between the ages of eighteen and twenty-one is not so identifiable a group that their exclusion renders the jury nonrepresentative of the general community.