Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite O'Neill v. City of New Orleans, 30 La. Ann. 220.

7 citing documents.

Pepper v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 137 So. 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Howard v. City of New Orleans 105 So. 443 La. 1925
' Among the cases cited by him, in support of-his contention that municipalities have been held liable in cases of that type, are those holding that they are liable for injuries caused by ■defects in their streets and sidewalks, or by pbstacles negligently placed' by- their agents thereon, and these cases are: O’ , 31 Am.
Wiltz v. City of New Orleans 2 La. App. 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In the leading case of O’Neil vs. City, , a plaintiff fell from a gutter crossing in bad condition.
Smith v. City of New Orleans 66 So. 319 La. 1914
We cannot accept the doctrine that a city can permit such structures to rot, and then avoid liability on the ground of want of actual notice of their dangerous condition.” The doctrine of the cases cited finds support in O’ , 31 Am.
Goodwyn v. City of Shreveport 64 So. 762 La. 1914
Allen v. Town of Minden 53 So. 666 La. 1910
Aucoin v. City of New Orleans 105 La. 271 La. 1901
Turner vs. City of Newburg, 109 N. Y. 301,307 ; O’Neil vs. City of New Orleans, ; Cline vs. Ry.