Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robinson v. Goudchaux's, 307 So. 2d 287.
- Lewin v. First Paratransit Corp. 387 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Onwukwe v. Kroger Co. 380 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Junot v. Lee 372 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
- Breda v. Attaway 371 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
-
Coleman v. Kroger Co.
371 So. 2d 1186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Insurance, 195 La.
- Lees v. Smith 363 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
-
Star Electric Supply, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
354 So. 2d 647
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
“The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal at .
- Jefferson v. SS Kresge Co. 344 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Cerna v. Rhodes 341 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Culpepper v. Ballard 344 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
-
Fontenot v. West Bros. of Eunice, Inc.
343 So. 2d 446
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Robinson v. Goudchaux’s, Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Insurance Association, 194 La.
- Joyner v. Weaver 337 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
-
Bristow v. Messer
336 So. 2d 44
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
(1975) approved the following statement with respect to such actions: "`An action for maliciously putting the law in motion lies in all cases where there is a concurrence of the following elements: (1) The commencement or continuance of an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding.
-
Johnson v. Pearce
313 So. 2d 812
La. 1975
Recently, we reaffirmed the rule of law stated in Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Ins.