55,216-KA Nonprecedential Per Curiam Processed

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy D. Rainey

Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit · Filed May 3, 2023

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

Judgment rendered May 3, 2023.

No. 55,216-KA

COURT OF APPEAL
SECOND CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA

*****

STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee

versus

JEREMY D. RAINEY Appellant

*****

Appealed from the
First Judicial District Court for the
Parish of Caddo, Louisiana
Trial Court No. 382,184

Honorable Erin Leigh Waddell Garrett, Judge

*****

LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT Counsel for Appellant
By: Douglas Lee Harville

JAMES E. STEWART, SR. Counsel for Appellee
District Attorney

ROSS S. OWEN
ERICA N. JEFFERSON
Assistant District Attorneys

*****

Before COX, STEPHENS, and ELLENDER, JJ.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
Rule 2-16.3, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the defendant’s convictions and sentences for

possession with intent to distribute a Schedule I CDS, marijuana (less than

two and one-half pounds), possession with intent to distribute a Schedule II

CDS, methamphetamine (less than 28 grams), possession with intent to

distribute a Schedule II CDS, cocaine (less than 28 grams), illegal carrying

of weapons while in possession of a CDS, and possession of a firearm by a

convicted felon. A review of the appellate record reveals that the trial court

failed to rule on the defendant’s pro se motion for post-verdict judgment of

acquittal prior to sentencing the defendant, in accordance with La. C. Cr. P.

art. 821.

Accordingly, the defendant’s sentences are hereby vacated, the appeal

is dismissed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further

proceedings. The defendant may appeal any adverse rulings or any

sentences subsequently imposed. State v. Jackson, 614 So. 2d 783 (La. App.

2 Cir. 1993); State v. Whitaker, 51,632 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/25/17), 225 So. 3d

524.