Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Peters, 302 So. 2d 888.
- State v. Romero 533 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Melton 456 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Wall 452 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Baker 452 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Kibodeaux 435 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Cobb 419 So. 2d 1237 La. 1982
- State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
-
State v. Trosclair
350 So. 2d 1164
La. 1977
State v. Kaufman, La., (1976); State v. Peters, La., (1974).
- State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
- State v. Passman 345 So. 2d 874 La. 1977
-
State v. Haynes
339 So. 2d 328
La. 1976
See State v. Peters, La., (1974); State v. Washington, La., (1974); State v. Vassel, La., (1973).
-
State v. Hatter
338 So. 2d 100
La. 1976
Although the trial judge is granted wide discretion in determining the permissible scope of rebuttal testimony, (La.
-
State v. Brumfield
329 So. 2d 181
La. 1976
where this Court again held that it was proper argument to refer to the seriousness of drug addiction and the need to suppress the evil in the community.
-
State v. Miller
319 So. 2d 339
La. 1975
Defendant is not entitled to the names of witnesses, the transcript of a grand jury proceeding, State v. Devore, supra ; details of the arrest of the defendant, the income tax returns of alleged accomplices, State v. Mitchell, 258 La.