Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landreneau v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 309 So. 2d 283.

31 citing documents.

Winn-Dixie Louisiana v. Physicians Surgical Specialty Hospital 156 So. 3d 1129 La. 2014
Co., Adams v. Cajun Disposal, 96-1304 (La.App.
Lopez v. Marques Food Distributors 110 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Falgout , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the concept of modification in workers’ compensation cases as follows: “The entire compensation scheme instigated by the Legislature strongly envisions that compensation shall be made during the entire period of disability so long as the maximum period is not exceeded.”
Sonya Reeder Seaman v. Charles W. Seaman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Seaman v. Seaman 54 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Marathon Oil Co. v. Bowling 56 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See, Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 98-1810 (La.04/16/99), ; Chaisson v. Central Crane Service, 10-0112 (La.App.
Jackson v. M.R. Pittman, LLC 5 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Poche v. HUEY P. LONG MEDICAL CENTER 983 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Sandra Poche v. Huey P. Long Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
K-Mart Corp. v. Malbrough 928 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
The purpose of the modification statute is to allow adjustments to be made after judgment “to insure that the employee will be paid compensation during the full period of his disability and that the employer will not be required to pay for any longer than this period of disability.” (citing Malone & Johnson, Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice § 281, pp. 57-58 (1st ed. 1964 Supp.)).
Schindler v. Orleans Regional Security Institute Inc. 891 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Madere v. WESTERN SOUTHERN LIFE INS. CO. 845 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Co., -86 (La.1975), [2] Falgout, supra ; Jackson v. Iberia Parish Gov't, 98-1810 (La.4/16/99), , [3] Also, e.g., see Landreneau, supra .
Avdoyan v. Covington Country Club 844 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., -286 (La.1975)] was handed down, the legislature understood the "present law” under La.
Allen v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 830 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Otis v. LSUMC Police Department 828 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Rhodes v. Lewis 817 So. 2d 64 La. 2002
Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 748 So. 2d 399 La. 1999
Co., -86 (La.1975), this court opined, in dicta, [5] that the prescriptive period contained in La.
LaCour v. Hilti Corp. 733 So. 2d 1193 La. 1999
Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government 732 So. 2d 517 La. 1999
[4] Subsequently, this Court, citing Malone, rejected *523 Lacy 's rule that a claimant could only seek to modify an extant judgment under LSA-R.S.
Criticized Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 724 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Adams v. CAJUN DISPOSAL INC. 691 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Veal v. American Maintenance & Repair, Inc. 657 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Co., -85 (La.1975); Jones v. Murphco, 93-540 (La.
Matthews v. Farley Industries 657 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Townsend v. PPG Industries, Inc. 628 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Schultz v. Katz and Besthoff, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
13:1209; Landreneau v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Bordelon v. Vulcan Materials Co. 472 So. 2d 5 La. 1985
LeBlanc v. Consolidated Aluminum Co. 433 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Coleman v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 421 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., (La.App.
Woodard v. J & M SEAFOOD RESTAURANT 413 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Bartley v. Insurance Co. of North America 406 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Malone-Johnson § 284; Long v. Alabama Petroleum Co., et al, 3 La.App.
Zachary v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 371 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Spears v. Glasscock Drilling, Inc. 324 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
23:1331; Landreneau v. Liberty Mutual Insttrance Company, La., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by