Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Banks, 307 So. 2d 594.

63 citing documents.

State v. Lampley 265 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/7/94), , the second circuit explained that "[t]he rules of Prieur were not meant to be used as additional, technical procedures sacramental to a valid conviction" ( , 597 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
15:480 ; State v. Frentz , ; see also State v. Harvey , ; ; State v. Ivy , ; State v. Banks
State of Louisiana v. Martin G. Lemoine 222 So. 3d 688 La. 2017
State v. Williams 199 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 05/31/05) , , writ denied, 06-1287 (01/26/07), ; -97 (La.1975).
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
/96), “[c]learly if the defense intends to develop a certain view of the defendant‟s background, the state should be allowed to elicit information to contradict these assertions.” Thus, “neither law nor justice permits a defendant to foist a spurious reputation upon a jury because the State is so limited in its cross-examination of the character witnesses.” (La.
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Albert L. Arnold La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
14:11; ” [G]eneral criminal intent is .
State v. Arnold 124 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
14:11; ” [Gjeneral criminal intent is ...
State v. Terrance 80 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith 934 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Mazique 919 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Brown , 05-102 at p. 3, 904 So.2d at 808 .
State v. Martin 913 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Brown 904 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Pierre 869 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
-597 (La.1975); State v. Ruffin, 02-798 (La.App.
State v. Black 864 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-597 (La.1975); State v. Ruffin, 02-798 (La.App.
State v. Staggers 860 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Tilley, 99-0569 (La.7/6/00), , cert.
State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
: "In spite of the words in R.S.
State v. Magee 809 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Donald 775 So. 2d 1054 La. 2000
-600 (La.1975) (evidence of prior narcotics sale made by defendant to same police officer relevant to officer's identification of defendant on charged crime).
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
76)(in prosecution for armed robbery, testimony that accused had been seen dressed in yellow pants and in possession of small blue pistol six days after the robbery was admissible, on rebuttal, for purpose of contradicting accused's testimony that he never owned a gun and had never seen such pistol and that such pants, in which the pistol had been found, had been stolen from him); (evidence of other crimes is admissible in rebuttal if the accused affirmatively raises specific issues of fact whic
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
See State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96); (The defendant has no right "`to foist a spurious reputation upon the jury' and `if the defense intends to develop a certain view of the defendant's background,' the State should be allowed to elicit information to contradict those assertions.") ().
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
Sepulvado , 93-2692 at p. 9-10, 672 So.2d at 165-66 ().
State v. Roberts 683 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Cinel 646 So. 2d 309 La. 1994
State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Gamble 631 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Hayes 614 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Silguero 608 So. 2d 627 La. 1992
(if defendant creates a genuine issue, the state may, under certain circumstances, use other crimes evidence to rebut the issue).
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Parker 536 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Nelson 518 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. McCullough 503 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hutchins 502 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Scroggins 465 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984
State v. Kelly 456 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Bernard 441 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Ester 436 So. 2d 543 La. 1983
State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
Criticized State v. Johnson 389 So. 2d 372 La. 1980
State v. Bagley 378 So. 2d 1356 La. 1979
State v. Morris 362 So. 2d 1379 La. 1978
State v. Marshall 359 So. 2d 78 La. 1978