Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Oliveaux, 312 So. 2d 337.

2141 citing documents.

State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Alexander 720 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Morris 719 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Lecoq 717 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Raymond 718 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Ayche 717 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Reynolds 716 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Stamp 718 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. McQuaig 718 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
ERROR PATENT: The record was reviewed for errors patent, according to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 920
State v. Hardy 715 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Lamothe 715 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Robinson 713 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Armant 719 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Boudreaux, 95-153 (La.
State v. Carter 712 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Lott 712 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Williams 714 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Gresham 712 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Stack 710 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Smith 710 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Evans 712 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Jackson 712 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Jarvis 710 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Gibson 708 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Jones 709 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The record was reviewed for errors patent, according to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 920
State v. Hayden 707 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Bell 709 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Gaines 707 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. McCorkle 708 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
art. 920 and we note the following error, namely that the trial court erred in failing to advise the defendant of the applicable prescriptive period for post-conviction relief as mandated by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Scamardo 708 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Curtis 707 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Bacuzzi 708 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hubbard 708 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Spencer 707 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Issac 702 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Adamo 702 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Givens 701 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Mohamed 700 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
and no errors were found.
State v. Brumley 700 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 698 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
art. 920 we have conducted a review for errors patent.
State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Rowan 694 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Birden, 95-1007 (La.App.
State v. Guccione 694 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Styles 692 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Evans 692 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Christmann 692 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
art. 920 including a determination of whether the defendant was properly "Boykinized," and we find no errors which would warrant corrective action by this court.