DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., Crowley v. Boutte, 309 So. 2d 274.

23 citing documents.

  • The Cadle Co. v. Anderson 18 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Louisiana Bank and Trust Company, -280 (La.1975).
  • Fitch v. Toys "R" Us—Delaware, Inc. 876 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., Crowley v. *187 Boutte
  • IRL R. SILVERSTEIN, PLC. v. Juarez 740 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., (La.
  • Robin E. Owens & Associates, Inc. v. Booth 729 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    3 Cir.1974), judgment affirmed
  • Commercial National Bank in Shreveport v. Pipe Sales of Shreveport, Inc. 600 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    First National Bank of Crowley v. Green Garden Processing Company, Inc., supra; Louisiana Bank & Trust Company, LSA-C.C.
  • SECURITY FIRST NAT. BANK v. Richards 584 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    The defendants argue that the decision of the Supreme Court in Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., is in their favor.
  • Criticized Bordelon v. Smith 506 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    [3] The Louisiana Supreme Court has even gone so far as to hold that a solidary surety is a principal, but that decision has been uniformly criticized.
  • FIRST NAT. BANK OF WEST MONROE v. Pickens 465 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    In Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., the Supreme Court held that the release of the principal debtor, when accompanied by a reservation of rights against other parties, does not discharge the solidary surety.
  • Jilek v. Covert 465 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    n. 7 (La.1975)), *104 the paying UM carrier has nothing more than subrogation to the tort victim's claim.
  • Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co. 462 So. 2d 159 La. 1985
    See *166 Louisiana Bank &amp
  • King Musical Instruments, Inc. v. Arceneaux Music Center, Inc. 441 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    2106, 3035, 3052, 3053, 3077; Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.
  • Carter's Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Franklin 428 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    art. 3052; Louisiana Bank and Trust Company
  • Domingues Motors, Inc. v. Lalonde 417 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Plaintiff argues in our case, however, that the surety's contractual agreement was that his liability "shall not be affected" by discharge of the debtor and that therefore, as in Louisiana Bank & T. Co.; Crowley v. Boutte, La.1975, , the ordinary rule of law that the discharge of the debtor discharges the sureties, C.C.
  • General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Smith 399 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Plaintiff argues in our case, however, that the surety's contractual agreement was that his liability "shall not be affected" by discharge of the debtor and that therefore, as in Louisiana Bank & T. Co., Crowley v. Boutte, La.1975, , the ordinary rule of law that the discharge of the debtor discharges the sureties, C.C.
  • Daigle v. Chaisson 396 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    See, Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., "
  • Parrino v. Parrino 393 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., the court said: “Among the co-obligors, however, bound in solido, the legal relationships may be governed by the rules of suretyship.
  • First Nat. Bank of Crowley v. Green Garden Processing Company, Inc. 387 So. 2d 1070 La. 1980
    interpreting it as requiring that the principal debtor and the individual guarantors all be included in determining the virile shares of each.
  • Wisconsin Capital Corp. v. Trans World Land Title Corp. 378 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Louisiana Bank and Trust Co.
  • First National Bank of Crowley v. Green Garden Processing Co. 371 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    In Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., , (La.1975), a continuing guaranty agreement very similar to the instruments involved in the present case was signed by four guarantors.
  • Aiavolasiti v. Versailles Gardens Land Development Co. 371 So. 2d 755 La. 1979
    In Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., this Court, in reviewing a continuing guaranty almost identical to those now under scrutiny, held that the effect of the application of articles 2106 [4] and 3045 [5] of the Civil Code is that, as between the creditor and the surety bound in solido with the debtor, the obligations of the surety are governed
  • First National Bank of Jefferson Parish v. Louisiana Purchase Corp. 346 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    We refer to the case of Louisiana Bank & Louisiana Revised Civil Code Article 3045, and 2 Planiol, 768.
  • Bonura v. Christiana Bros. Poultry Co. of Gretna, Inc. 336 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Although the Supreme Court subsequently amended the holding at (1975), the opinion recognized that prescription on a guaranty does not begin to run until the principal indebtedness sued on arises.
  • First Nat. Bank of Lafayette v. Doni Homes, Inc. 338 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Compare Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., which deals with solidary sureties under a continuing guaranty.