Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thomas, 310 So. 2d 517.

38 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Eletius Proby La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
430, 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct.
State v. Estes 168 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
430 , 62 L.Ed.2d 325 (1979); State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Cambrice 884 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Nonetheless, stands for the proposition that our statutory procedure is not constitutionally infirm because it does not afford the defendant the right to have the state pay for an independent psychiatric examination.
State v. Portis 811 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. King 573 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Dorociak 493 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
” State v. Parker, supra.
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Walters 408 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
State v. Smith 407 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Castillo 389 So. 2d 1307 La. 1980
State v. Jones, supra ; State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Jones 386 So. 2d 1363 La. 1980
State v. Robinson 384 So. 2d 332 La. 1980
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. George 371 So. 2d 762 La. 1979
State v. Higginbotham, 261 La.
State v. Brown 370 So. 2d 525 La. 1979
State v. Parker 355 So. 2d 900 La. 1978
State v. Haley 353 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
In addition to the authorities cited by the defense, also stand for the proposition that our statutory procedure is not constitutionally infirm because it does not afford the defendant the right to have the State pay for an independent psychiatric examination.
State v. Thornton 351 So. 2d 480 La. 1977
State v. Lain 347 So. 2d 167 La. 1977
(the warrantless search was authorized "while it [the automobile] was still located on the highway")
State v. Williams 347 So. 2d 231 La. 1977
1975 , 1981 n. 10, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 , 429 n. 10 (1970); supra; (La.
State v. Stuart 344 So. 2d 1006 La. 1977
State v. Gray, supra; State v. Square, 257 La.
State v. Passman 345 So. 2d 874 La. 1977
State v. Hearn 340 So. 2d 1365 La. 1976
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Davenport 340 So. 2d 251 La. 1976
State v. Lee 340 So. 2d 180 La. 1976
State v. Franklin, 263 La.
State v. Smith 340 So. 2d 247 La. 1976
2726 , 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972)
State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
State v. Franklin, 263 La.
State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
State v. Owens 338 So. 2d 645 La. 1976
State v. Huizar 332 So. 2d 449 La. 1976
State v. Thomas, La., (1975); State v. Hall, 257 La.
State v. Breaux 329 So. 2d 696 La. 1976
State v. Johnson 327 So. 2d 388 La. 1976
State v. Howard 325 So. 2d 812 La. 1976
State v. Taylor 324 So. 2d 425 La. 1975
State v. Major 318 So. 2d 19 La. 1975
The effect of defendant's argument is to urge upon this court an extension of pretrial discovery, an extension this court has been reluctant to make ( State v. Lewis, La., ; ), with the exception of a few well delineated circumstances.