Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hebert v. Green, 311 So. 2d 223.

19 citing documents.

Wendling v. Chambliss 36 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Trautman v. Poor 685 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Moreover, reversing this court, instructed us that: "The mandatory uninsured motorist coverage of R.S.
Egros v. Pempton 588 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies 557 So. 2d 966 La. 1990
Bosch v. Cummings 520 So. 2d 721 La. 1988
Accordingly, this court has declined to interpret the inexplicit language of the statute so as to grant the insurer an independent right of action against an underinsured motorist or his liability insurer, or permit the uninsured motorist carrier to enforce a clause excluding uninsured motorist coverage in the event of its insured's failure to obtain its consent before entering a reasonable settlement with an underinsured tortfeasor and his insurer, Neimann v. Travelers Ins.
Johnson v. Jackson 504 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Bloodworth v. Carroll 455 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Earl v. Commercial U. Ins.
Wilson v. State Farm Ins. Co. 448 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Earl v. Commercial U. Ins.
Hickerson v. Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha 375 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Niemann v. Travelers Ins. Co. 368 So. 2d 1003 La. 1979
In support of his argument that the consent to settle clause in Travelers' policy is invalid, in which this Court refused to uphold a similar consent to settle clause.
Niemann v. Travelers Insurance Co. 360 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Whitten v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 353 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Nicholson v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 332 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
In support of their position, Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Ardoin v. Bordelon, *908 (La.App.
Raggio v. Volkswagen Insurance Co. 327 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Landry v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. 320 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
686 , (1972); Crenwelge v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Porter v. Travelers Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
the Supreme Court declared this "settlement without consent" exclusionary clause invalid when applied to exclude coverage when settlement has been made with an insured co-tortfeasor.
Lorio v. Safeco Insurance Company of America 316 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Hebert v. Green, La., (1975) and Moreau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. et al., La., (1975).
Barbin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 315 So. 2d 754 La. 1975
[3] *758 Graham , Deane , have held that any clause in derogation of the mandatory requirement that an insured provide uninsured-motorist coverage in certain limits for each insured vehicle, La.R.S.
Ray v. DeMaggio 313 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
[2] No. 55354 of the docket of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, .