Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rester, 309 So. 2d 321.

59 citing documents.

  • State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley 606 So. 2d 1292 La. 1992
    we wrote: Opinions concerning retroactive or prospective application of new-found constitutional rights are not good subjects for careful analysis.
  • State v. Schrader 518 So. 2d 1024 La. 1988
  • State v. Schrader 506 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
  • State v. Santacruz 392 So. 2d 380 La. 1980
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
  • State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
    State v. Sheppard, supra
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
  • State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
  • State v. King 347 So. 2d 1108 La. 1977
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Short 345 So. 2d 37 La. 1977
  • State v. Ross 343 So. 2d 722 La. 1977
  • State v. Williams 343 So. 2d 1026 La. 1977
  • Overruled State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
  • State v. Calloway 343 So. 2d 694 La. 1976
    State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
  • State v. Miles 339 So. 2d 735 La. 1976
    See, e.g., State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974).
  • State v. Nicolaus 340 So. 2d 296 La. 1976
    State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
  • State v. James 339 So. 2d 741 La. 1976
    State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
  • State v. Watkins 340 So. 2d 235 La. 1976
  • State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
  • State v. McDaniel 340 So. 2d 242 La. 1976
    Daniel v. State of Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Roach 338 So. 2d 621 La. 1976
  • State v. Ballard 337 So. 2d 468 La. 1976
    State v. Gaines, supra; State v. Nero, La., (1975); State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Sonnier, La., (1975).
  • State v. Cooper 334 So. 2d 211 La. 1976
  • State v. Shepherd 332 So. 2d 228 La. 1976
    Also, we decided that, as a matter of state law, the rule of the Taylor case would not be applied retroactively.
  • State v. Kaufman 331 So. 2d 16 La. 1976
  • State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
    The opinions of the United States Supreme Court have developed no clear test or analysis governing the retroactivity of new found constitutional rights (), nor do these opinions control in the case before us. Nonetheless, the action we take is in accordance with opinions of that court providing that except where the so-called new rule goes to the very integrity of the factfinding process, Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Reed 324 So. 2d 373 La. 1975
    Then, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the Taylor holding would not be applied retroactively in Louisiana.
  • State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
  • State v. Zeno 322 So. 2d 136 La. 1975
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
  • State v. King 322 So. 2d 205 La. 1975
    However, this court held that the Taylor decision will not be applied retroactively, in accord with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Smith 322 So. 2d 197 La. 1975
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
  • State v. Lockett 319 So. 2d 420 La. 1975
  • State v. Martin 319 So. 2d 383 La. 1975
    Assignment No. 2: The fingerprints and table cloth found in the burglarized shop are not shown to be irrelevant or inadmissible; Assignment No. 5: Nor is any legal reason advanced to support the inadmissibility of the blood type of the defendant Martin, as shown by admissible blood donor records based on th
  • State v. Nicholas 319 So. 2d 361 La. 1975
    704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975) Bill No. 3, attacking the constitutionality of La.R.S.
  • State v. Brown 319 So. 2d 409 La. 1975
    the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the reasoning in Daniel v. Louisiana, supra , in holding that Taylor v. Louisiana , was not retroactive.
  • State v. Mouton 319 So. 2d 331 La. 1975
    820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1974) (a woman codefendant)
  • State v. Burkhalter 319 So. 2d 392 La. 1975
    see also Daniels v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
    State v. Rester, La., (1975).
  • State v. Roberts 319 So. 2d 317 La. 1975
    and has consistently affirmed that decision.
  • State v. Houston 316 So. 2d 724 La. 1975
  • State v. Sonnier 317 So. 2d 190 La. 1975
    that we would not give the Taylor case retroactive effect.
  • State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
  • State v. Lewis 315 So. 2d 626 La. 1975
    we decided, that as a matter of state law, the rule of the Taylor case would not be applied retroactively.
  • State v. Wright 316 So. 2d 380 La. 1975
  • State v. Morgan 315 So. 2d 632 La. 1975
  • State v. Wilson 315 So. 2d 646 La. 1975
  • State v. Anderson 315 So. 2d 266 La. 1975
  • State v. Jones 315 So. 2d 650 La. 1975
    See State v. Rester, La., (1975).
  • State ex rel. Donahue v. Henderson 313 So. 2d 243 La. 1975
    Also State v. Rester, La., .