Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rester, 309 So. 2d 321.
-
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley
606 So. 2d 1292
La. 1992
we wrote: Opinions concerning retroactive or prospective application of new-found constitutional rights are not good subjects for careful analysis.
- State v. Schrader 518 So. 2d 1024 La. 1988
- State v. Schrader 506 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
-
State v. Santacruz
392 So. 2d 380
La. 1980
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
-
State v. Martin
376 So. 2d 300
La. 1979
State v. Sheppard, supra
- State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
- State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
- State v. King 347 So. 2d 1108 La. 1977
- City of Baton Rouge v. Short 345 So. 2d 37 La. 1977
- State v. Ross 343 So. 2d 722 La. 1977
- State v. Williams 343 So. 2d 1026 La. 1977
- Overruled State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
-
State v. Calloway
343 So. 2d 694
La. 1976
State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
-
State v. Miles
339 So. 2d 735
La. 1976
See, e.g., State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974).
-
State v. Nicolaus
340 So. 2d 296
La. 1976
State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Brown, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
-
State v. James
339 So. 2d 741
La. 1976
State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Adams, La., (1974); State v. Fallon, La., (1974).
- State v. Watkins 340 So. 2d 235 La. 1976
- State v. Hunter 340 So. 2d 226 La. 1976
-
State v. Jenkins
340 So. 2d 157
La. 1976
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
-
State v. McDaniel
340 So. 2d 242
La. 1976
Daniel v. State of Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
- State v. Roach 338 So. 2d 621 La. 1976
-
State v. Ballard
337 So. 2d 468
La. 1976
State v. Gaines, supra; State v. Nero, La., (1975); State v. Rester, La., (1975); State v. Sonnier, La., (1975).
- State v. Cooper 334 So. 2d 211 La. 1976
-
State v. Shepherd
332 So. 2d 228
La. 1976
Also, we decided that, as a matter of state law, the rule of the Taylor case would not be applied retroactively.
- State v. Kaufman 331 So. 2d 16 La. 1976
-
State v. Liesk
326 So. 2d 871
La. 1976
The opinions of the United States Supreme Court have developed no clear test or analysis governing the retroactivity of new found constitutional rights (), nor do these opinions control in the case before us. Nonetheless, the action we take is in accordance with opinions of that court providing that except where the so-called new rule goes to the very integrity of the factfinding process, Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 , 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Reed
324 So. 2d 373
La. 1975
Then, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the Taylor holding would not be applied retroactively in Louisiana.
-
State v. Nix
327 So. 2d 301
La. 1975
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
-
State v. Zeno
322 So. 2d 136
La. 1975
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
-
State v. King
322 So. 2d 205
La. 1975
However, this court held that the Taylor decision will not be applied retroactively, in accord with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
-
State v. Smith
322 So. 2d 197
La. 1975
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975)
- State v. Lockett 319 So. 2d 420 La. 1975
-
State v. Martin
319 So. 2d 383
La. 1975
Assignment No. 2: The fingerprints and table cloth found in the burglarized shop are not shown to be irrelevant or inadmissible; Assignment No. 5: Nor is any legal reason advanced to support the inadmissibility of the blood type of the defendant Martin, as shown by admissible blood donor records based on th
-
State v. Nicholas
319 So. 2d 361
La. 1975
704 , 42 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975) Bill No. 3, attacking the constitutionality of La.R.S.
-
State v. Brown
319 So. 2d 409
La. 1975
the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the reasoning in Daniel v. Louisiana, supra , in holding that Taylor v. Louisiana , was not retroactive.
-
State v. Mouton
319 So. 2d 331
La. 1975
820 , 42 L.Ed.2d 832 (1974) (a woman codefendant)
-
State v. Burkhalter
319 So. 2d 392
La. 1975
see also Daniels v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 , 95 S.Ct.
-
State v. Nero
319 So. 2d 303
La. 1975
State v. Rester, La., (1975).
-
State v. Roberts
319 So. 2d 317
La. 1975
and has consistently affirmed that decision.
- State v. Houston 316 So. 2d 724 La. 1975
-
State v. Sonnier
317 So. 2d 190
La. 1975
that we would not give the Taylor case retroactive effect.
- State v. Monk 315 So. 2d 727 La. 1975
-
State v. Lewis
315 So. 2d 626
La. 1975
we decided, that as a matter of state law, the rule of the Taylor case would not be applied retroactively.
- State v. Wright 316 So. 2d 380 La. 1975
- State v. Morgan 315 So. 2d 632 La. 1975
- State v. Wilson 315 So. 2d 646 La. 1975
- State v. Anderson 315 So. 2d 266 La. 1975
-
State v. Jones
315 So. 2d 650
La. 1975
See State v. Rester, La., (1975).
-
State ex rel. Donahue v. Henderson
313 So. 2d 243
La. 1975
Also State v. Rester, La., .