Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins, 329 So. 2d 437.

98 citing documents.

Chatelain v. STATE, DOTD 586 So. 2d 1373 La. 1991
McCormick on Evidence § 340(B) (3d ed. 1984)
Disciplinary Board v. Roy 573 So. 2d 456 La. 1991
Succession of Wallace 574 So. 2d 348 La. 1991
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., supra; Succession of Boyenga, supra; (La.
THIBAUT v. Smith and Loveless 576 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
[quoting Hood, Renewed Emphasis on Professional Responsibility, 35 La.L.Rev.
Hines v. Williams 567 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
France v. a & M WOOD CO. 566 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins 560 So. 2d 831 La. 1990
s, (respondent disbarred for misconduct including commingling of funds in the John Day account and aiding and abetting Robertson in the unauthorized practice of law); Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins, (respondent suspended for two years for misconduct including commingling of funds in the John Day account); (respondent suspended for ninety days and reprimanded).
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Lindsay 553 So. 2d 807 La. 1989
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Dumaine 550 So. 2d 1197 La. 1989
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins 540 So. 2d 294 La. 1989
Ex Parte Steckler, 179 La.
Mire v. City of Lake Charles 540 So. 2d 950 La. 1989
The authority preceding Saucier included: Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Connolly, 201 La.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Farmer 537 So. 2d 1148 La. 1989
37:211, (1976); In re Mundy, 202 La.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Ranel 534 So. 2d 951 La. 1988
37:211, (1976); In re Mundy, 202 La.
Neely v. Hollywood Marine, Inc. 530 So. 2d 1116 La. 1988
Const., Art. V, § 5(B); (La.
State v. Spooner 520 So. 2d 336 La. 1988
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Edwins 519 So. 2d 93 La. 1988
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 515 So. 2d 780 La. 1987
1982); Singer, Hutner, Levine, Seeman & Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., Ex Parte Steckler, 179 La.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Chatelain 513 So. 2d 1178 La. 1987
Clark v. Aetna Life Ins. 510 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Brannon v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 507 So. 2d 194 La. 1987
Succession of Launius 503 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Sims v. Selvage 499 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Central Progressive Bank v. Bradley 496 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 488 So. 2d 1002 La. 1986
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins Ex Parte Steckler, 179 La.
Succession of Ellis 486 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Gale v. Hession 486 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. McGovern 481 So. 2d 574 La. 1986
37:211, (1976); In re Mundy, 202 La.
Davis v. Lamont 481 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
In re L.M.S. 476 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Edwins
Matter of LMS 476 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Succession of Bartie 472 So. 2d 578 La. 1985
Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Edwins
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Koerner 457 So. 2d 633 La. 1984
I there is ‘clear and convincing evidence’ of the allegations in Specification No. 1 and accordingly, it is sustained.
Succession of Lyons 452 So. 2d 1161 La. 1984
Deer Slayers v. LA. MOTEL AND INV. CORP. 434 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Mundy 423 So. 2d 1126 La. 1982
Staten v. Security Industrial Ins. Co. 414 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
the court defined clear and convincing evidence as follows: "Clear and convincing evidence," in general, means that the fact of guilt must be proven to a greater degree than by "a mere preponderance of the evidence" but less than "beyond a reasonable doubt" ...
Coon v. Landry 408 So. 2d 262 La. 1981
Justice Tate 4 commented on this issue in footnote 1 : “1.
Coon v. Landry 400 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Causey 393 So. 2d 88 La. 1981
Simon v. Metoyer 383 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
SINGER HUNTER LEVINE, ETC. v. La. State Bar Ass'n 378 So. 2d 423 La. 1979
[4] Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc., (La.
Scott v. Kemper Ins. Co. 377 So. 2d 66 La. 1979
Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg. 376 So. 2d 495 La. 1979
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Beard 374 So. 2d 1179 La. 1979
There was “clear and convincing evidence” () supporting the Commissioner’s findings concerning these charges.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Jordan 375 So. 2d 89 La. 1979
-42 (La.1976) and decisions therein cited.
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 373 So. 2d 102 La. 1979
v. Edwins, Ex Parte Steckler, 179 La.
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Ungar 355 So. 2d 936 La. 1978
(c) That at least in part, and to some degree, the sentiments of this Court in the case of Louisiana State Bar Association versus Edwins, La., (1976) have some application herein.