DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Murphy, 309 So. 2d 134.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Rubin 649 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    ant was standing on a particular street corner waiting to buy ten bags of heroin from a New York dealer was inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay); (officer's testimony that an informant told him the defendant committed the armed robbery was inadmissible hearsay and was prejudicial because it directly related to the guilt of the accused); (officer's testimony that a confidential informant told him the defendant was one of the perpetrators involved in the armed robbery was inadmissible hearsay and
  • State v. Preston 623 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Hearold 603 So. 2d 731 La. 1992
    ant was standing on a particular street corner waiting to buy ten bags of heroin from a New York dealer was inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay); (officer's testimony that an informant told him the defendant committed the armed robbery was inadmissible hearsay and was prejudicial because it directly related to the guilt of the accused); (officer's testimony that a confidential informant told him the defendant was one of the perpetrators involved in the armed robbery was inadmissible hearsay and
  • State v. Williams 569 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Griffin 568 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. White 559 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    State v. Thompson, supra; (La.
  • State v. Lapworth 517 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Banks 428 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Appellant cites State v. Murphy for the proposition that to permit an officer to relate an informant's hearsay statements requires automatic reversal, at least in those instances where the statement directly implicates the defendant in the commission of a crime.
  • State v. Turner 392 So. 2d 436 La. 1980
  • State ex rel. Hotard 369 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    State v. Williams, 258 La.
  • State v. Scott 358 So. 2d 1271 La. 1978
  • State v. Lemelle 353 So. 2d 1312 La. 1977
  • State v. Jacobs 344 So. 2d 659 La. 1977
    (1975) (noted with approval at 36 La.L.Rev.
  • State v. Thompson 331 So. 2d 848 La. 1976
  • State v. Williams 331 So. 2d 467 La. 1976
    art. 921; State v. Hayden, 243 La.
  • State v. Green 315 So. 2d 763 La. 1975