Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perkins, 310 So. 2d 591.

18 citing documents.

State v. Taylor 688 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
*1271 1982); or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Campbell 566 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Lilly 552 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Comeaux 505 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Furthermore, the Supreme Court explained that the State is not required to produce police reports of a testifying officer unless (1) the officer has physical possession of the report on the stand and testifies from it; or (2) the officers testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though the officer does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Guillory 502 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Trahan 463 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
or (2) the officer testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though the officer does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Brown 461 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
1982); or (2) the witness testified exclusively from his past recollection recorded even though he does not have physical possession of the report on the stand.
State v. Latin 412 So. 2d 1357 La. 1982
State v. Kimble 407 So. 2d 693 La. 1981
State v. Tauzier 397 So. 2d 494 La. 1981
State v. Valentine 375 So. 2d 1378 La. 1979
State v. Hawthorne 364 So. 2d 917 La. 1978
State v. Jolla 337 So. 2d 197 La. 1976
State v. Perkins, La., (1975); State v. Lane, La., (1974); State v. Tharp, La., (1973).
State v. Monroe 329 So. 2d 193 La. 1976
961 , (1957); Bill No. 5, where the defense was denied an opportunity to inspect (or at least have the trial court inspect in camera) a document used by the witness to refresh his memory on the stand and after doing so gave testimony which varied from his earlier trial testimony, see State v. Perkins, La., (1975).
State v. Nero 319 So. 2d 303 La. 1975
Compare State v. Perkins, *308 La., (1975); State v. Tharp, La., (1973).
State v. Foret 315 So. 2d 278 La. 1975
(wherein it was held that the defendant was entitled to a copy of the reportpast recollection recorded) (La.