Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 310 So. 2d 513.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    “A trial jury’s inference that an accused aided and abetted in a crime cannot be ‘mere speculation based upon guilt by association.’” ().
  • State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    State v. Williams , La., (1975) ; State v. Hollingsworth , La., (1974) ; State v. Washington , La., (1975) [ (1974) ].
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Jones La. 2018
    1978)) (“[a] trial jury’s inference that an accused aided and abetted in a crime cannot be ‘mere speculation based upon guilt by association.’”) ( (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Scott Allen Cooper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    A jury’s finding that the accused aided and abetted in the commission of the crime therefore “cannot be ‘mere speculation based upon guilt by association.’” State v. Schwander, supra, 345 So.2d at 1175 [].
  • State v. Cooper 862 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    A jury's finding that the accused aided and abetted in the commission of the crime therefore "cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'" State v. Schwander, supra, 345 So.2d at 1175 [ ].
  • State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
  • State v. Vale 699 So. 2d 876 La. 1997
    ") (); see also State v. Harris, 94-0970, p. 4 (La.12/8/94), ("`mere presence of someone in the area where the controlled dangerous substance is found, or mere association with the person found to be in possession of the contraband, is insufficient to constitute constructive possession' ")
  • State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    A jury's finding that the accused aided and abetted in the commission of the crime therefore "cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'" State v. Schwander, supra, 345 So.2d at 1175 [].
  • State v. Girod 653 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    A jury's finding that a defendant aided and abetted in the commission of the crime "cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'" [].
  • State v. Long 643 So. 2d 132 La. 1994
  • State v. Pierre 631 So. 2d 427 La. 1994
    A jury's finding that the accused aided and abetted in the commission of the crime therefore "cannot be `mere speculation based upon guilt by association.'" State v. Schwander, supra, 345 So.2d at 1175 [ ].
  • State v. McIntyre 544 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Jessie 429 So. 2d 859 La. 1983
  • State v. Bernard 404 So. 2d 914 La. 1981
  • State v. LaFleur 398 So. 2d 1074 La. 1981
  • State v. Walker 394 So. 2d 1181 La. 1981
  • State v. Durio 371 So. 2d 1158 La. 1979
  • State v. Victor 368 So. 2d 711 La. 1979
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
    State v. Perkins, La., (1976); State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Gray 351 So. 2d 448 La. 1977
  • State v. Schwander 345 So. 2d 1173 La. 1977
  • State v. Walker 344 So. 2d 990 La. 1977
    534 , (1963); State v. Williams, La., (1975).
  • State v. Elzie 343 So. 2d 712 La. 1977
  • State v. McMorris 343 So. 2d 1011 La. 1977
  • State v. Reeves 342 So. 2d 605 La. 1977
  • State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 1390 La. 1976
  • State v. Duhon 340 So. 2d 1348 La. 1976
  • State v. Smith 339 So. 2d 829 La. 1976
  • State v. Otis 339 So. 2d 343 La. 1976
  • State v. Andrews 337 So. 2d 1175 La. 1976
  • State v. Stowell 338 So. 2d 661 La. 1976
    See State v. Williams, La., (1975); State v. Collins, La., (1975); State v. Cade, 244 La.
  • State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
    In State v. Williams, La., (1975), we stated: "The motions for a new trial are without merit for the same reasons.
  • State v. Flowers 337 So. 2d 469 La. 1976
  • State v. Butler 331 So. 2d 425 La. 1976
  • State v. Bartley 329 So. 2d 431 La. 1976
    State v. Williams, La., (1975); State v. Hollingsworth, La., (1974); State v. Washington, La., (1975).
  • State v. Madison 319 So. 2d 912 La. 1975
    the court held: "Nevertheless, the trial jury's commonsense inference that the defendants aided and abetted in the robbery is not mere speculation based upon guilt by association.