Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 310 So. 2d 544.

31 citing documents.

State in the Interest of C.D. 93 So. 3d 1272 La. 2012
40:961(9) & (13); ).
State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Ruiz 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson 846 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
App. 4 Cir.1993)( (La.App.
State v. Jackson 800 So. 2d 854 La. 2001
State v. Magee 809 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Black 786 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Bradford 745 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Simon, 607 So.2d *805 793 (La.App.
State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Crawford 727 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Cummings 668 So. 2d 1132 La. 1996
State v. Celestine 671 So. 2d 896 La. 1996
State v. Manuel 646 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Parker 627 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
that it was unnecessary to allege the name of the buyer of a controlled substance when a charge of distribution is made.
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Coutee 545 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
15:494; also, in which the defendant was not allowed to impeach a witness with testimony concerning his alleged failure to account for funds in his previous investigative work.
State v. Parker 536 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Hutchins 502 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Wagster 489 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Ashworth 469 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The trial court sustained the State’s
State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
See LRS 15:441, 492, 494; State v. Jackson, 153 La.
State v. Gentry 450 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The jurisprudence has further defined “deliver” as meaning “transferring possession or control.”
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
See LRS 15:441, 492, 494; State v. Jackson, 153 La.
State v. Cappo 345 So. 2d 443 La. 1977
State v. Wiggins, 50 La.Ann.
State v. King 322 So. 2d 205 La. 1975
State v. Darby 310 So. 2d 547 La. 1975