Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Harris, 312 So. 2d 643.
- State v. Lavergne 716 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
State v. Absent
578 So. 2d 571
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra
- State v. Spencer 564 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- State v. Coates 528 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Blevins
479 So. 2d 1056
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
On the other hand, in a probation revocation hearing, the defendant does not begin with a clean slate although, he “is entitled to certain minimal procedural protection”.
- State v. Sonnier 437 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State, in Interest of Wright 387 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
-
State v. Varnado
384 So. 2d 440
La. 1980
in which this Court stated: "In remanding this case for further proceedings, we note an additional contention of the defendant.
- State v. Davis 375 So. 2d 69 La. 1979
- State v. Sussmann 374 So. 2d 1256 La. 1979
- State v. Harris 368 So. 2d 1066 La. 1979
-
State v. Mirambell
361 So. 2d 1208
La. 1978
As to the alleged violation of another condition (that the relator maintain psychiatric treatment), the written notice of the charge of probation violation did not specify this as a charge prior to the hearing and the court was in error in receiving evidence there as to, pretermitting whether the evidence so received actually proved such violation of this condition.
-
State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Maggio
341 So. 2d 366
La. 1976
1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973)
-
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Hunt
337 So. 2d 438
La. 1976
15:574.9; State v. O'Conner, La., (1975); State v. Harris, La., (1975).
-
State v. O'CONNER
312 So. 2d 645
La. 1975
See State v. Harris, La., (1975) No. 55,622, handed down this date.