Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hammler, 312 So. 2d 306.
-
State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Hammler, La., (1975); State v. Simpson, 247 La.
-
State v. Harper
53 So. 3d 1263
La. 2010
We further recognize the State and the defense in their adversarial roles are charged with equally encompassing duties, and it is the diligent performance of the State’s duty to disclose and the defense’s duty to investigate that successfully advances this “quest for truth.”
- State v. Weathersby 29 So. 3d 499 La. 2010
- State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
- State v. Borne 691 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- State v. Hidalgo 668 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Maize 655 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Parker 581 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Jamison
565 So. 2d 1080
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
In support of its position, which holds that a trial judge's disparaging remarks or intemperate criticism of defense counsel may constitute reversible error when such remarks adversely influence and prejudice the jury against the defendant.
-
State v. Poullard
532 So. 2d 327
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Accordingly, where the State advised the witnesses not to speak to defense attorneys.
- State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Turner
440 So. 2d 834
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Simpson, 247 La.
- State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
- State v. Willis 438 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Smith 430 So. 2d 31 La. 1983
- State v. Harris 367 So. 2d 322 La. 1979
-
State v. Doucet
359 So. 2d 1239
La. 1978
State v. Wallace, 254 La.
-
State v. May
339 So. 2d 764
La. 1976
Defendant, filed a motion to compel these witnesses to speak with defense counsel, or in the alternative, to bar their testimony at trial.
-
State v. Gallow
338 So. 2d 920
La. 1976
State v. Hammler, La., (1975); State v. Simpson, 247 La.