DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fluker, 311 So. 2d 863.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Darnell T. McKey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Jayden M. Boyd La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
    In support of his argument, (La.
  • State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated the appropriate test to be applied in prosecutions for illegal carrying of weapons, that is, “under the facts and circumstances of the case as disclosed by the evidence, the manner in which defendant carried the weapon evinced an intent to conceal its identity.” S
  • State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    300 (1929); (involving a pistol holster attached to the defendant’s belt on his right hip).
  • State Ex Rel. Km 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated the appropriate test to be applied in prosecutions for illegal carrying of weapons, that is, "under the facts and circumstances of the case as disclosed by the evidence, the manner in which defendant carried the weapon evinced an intent to conceal its identity."
  • State ex rel. K.M. 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
  • State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Maxwell 554 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated the appropriate test to be applied in prosecutions for illegal carrying of weapons, that is, "under the facts and circumstances of the case as disclosed by the evidence, the manner in which defendant carried the weapon evinced an intent to conceal its identity."
  • State v. Forest 553 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Jones 492 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Crayton 470 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    14:27:95.1; State v. Ford, supra
  • State v. Wall 440 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    [or] mechanistic standard as that of whether the weapon was partially or fully concealed.” fn.
  • State v. Johnson 422 So. 2d 1125 La. 1982
    1979) both of which held that a weapon must be concealed in its entirety on the body of the defendant in order to establish *1127 the crime of carrying a concealed weapon.
  • State v. Dyer 388 So. 2d 374 La. 1980
  • Overruled State v. White 376 So. 2d 124 La. 1979
    The jury instruction was inconsistent with our interpretation of a
  • State v. Bowen 376 So. 2d 147 La. 1979