Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stephens v. Justiss-Mears Oil Co., 312 So. 2d 293.

33 citing documents.

Trinidad Preciado v. Beaucoup Crawfish of Eunice La Restaurant Association Sif La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Stephens v. Justiss–Mears Oil Co., W. Malone & H. Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise—Workers Compensation § 168 (4th ed.2002).
Joseph D. Potier v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Stephens v. Justiss–Mears Oil Co., W. Malone & H. Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise—Workers Compensation § 168 (4th ed.2002).
Potier v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. 153 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
W. Malone & H. Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise — Workers Compensation § 168 (4th ed.2002).
Ruiz v. City of New Orleans 109 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Biscamp v. Sysco East Texas 63 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, Phipps v. Bruno Construction, 00-0480 (La.App.3d Cir.11/02/00)
Workers'comp. Corp. v. Nat. Serv. Indust. 980 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Martin v. Pride Offshore Co. 950 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 10/30/02) and Dupre v. Exxon Pipeline Co., 93-1528 (La.App.
James R. Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
W. Malone & H. Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise--Workers Compensation § 168 (4th ed. 2002).
Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply 926 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
W. Malone & H. Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise —Workers Compensation § 168 (4th ed.2002).
Dean v. Southmark Const. 879 So. 2d 112 La. 2004
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors, 02-1539, (La.2003), (); W. Malone & H. Johnson, supra at § 168.
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors 851 So. 2d 1135 La. 2003
Robert v. Lecompte 829 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Dupre v. Exxon Pipeline Co., 93-1528 (La.App.
Phipps v. Bruno Const. 773 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Tucker v. Northeast Louisiana Tree Service, 27,768 (La.
Alexander v. Hall 759 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Ligeikis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 745 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Gomez v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 745 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
LJ Earnest Const. v. Cox 714 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Kennedy v. Martin Gas Transp. Co., Inc. 680 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Tucker v. Northeast Louisiana Tree Service, 27,768 (La.App.
Hebert v. Jeffrey 653 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
McBride v. RF Kazimour Transp., Inc. 583 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Seay v. Wilson 569 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Pierce v. Ellis 519 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Michaleski, supra; (5) when, at the time of the accident, the employee is on a mission contemplated by the employer and employee, as well, for which the employee is to be compensated, the employee is considered to be within the scope of employment.
Major Transports, Ltd. v. Courville 493 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Michaleski v. Western Preferred Cas. Co. 472 So. 2d 18 La. 1985
Lee v. Allstate Ins. Co. 467 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Guidry v. Chevron USA, Inc. 461 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(claimant charged with assembling and assuring the arrival of work crew at the job site on time).
Reynolds v. Be-Neat Tank Cleaning Corp. 425 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
(2) when the accident occurs where the employer has interested himself in the transportation of the employee to and from work as an incident to the employment agreement, ( Landry v. Benson Gold Chevrolet, supra ); (3) when the employee is acting pursuant to an order of the employer ( or (4) where the employee was doing his work under the circumstances where the employer's consent could be fairly implied.
Jackson v. Justiss-Mears Oil Co. 420 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the court expressed the general rule applicable to this situation: "...
Arledge v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. 401 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 387 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
852 , ; Gardner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., supra)-and in those cases in which the operation of the motor vehicle was the performance of one of the duties of the employment of plaintiff ( Stephens v. Justiss-Mears Oil Co., La., (1975); Jackson v. Long, supra; Fabre v. Travelers Ins.
Malcomb v. Humphries Motors 347 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
3 Cir. 1974), and reversed by the Supreme Court as to the only appellant, Malcomb
Castille v. Sibille 342 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
852 , ; Gardner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., supra)and in those cases in which the operation of the motor vehicle was the performance of one of the duties of the employment of plaintiff ( Stephens v. Justiss-Mears Oil Co., La., (1975); Jackson v. Long, supra; Fabre v. Travelers Ins.