Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davalie, 313 So. 2d 587.

19 citing documents.

State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that an habitual offender enhanced sentence is not a conviction and the delay periods of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Francis 748 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
3098 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1978)
State v. Normand 735 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that an habitual offender enhanced sentence is not a conviction and the delay periods of Article 873 do not apply.
State v. Carouthers 607 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3rd Cir.1986), writs denied, , (La.
State v. Simpson 551 So. 2d 1303 La. 1989
Since adequate notice is a fundamental element of due process, the criminal docket for a particular day must indicate the order in which cases are to be called for trial.
State v. Ellis 487 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
However, held that such a delay was required.
State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
3098 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1138 (1978)
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
State v. Neal, La., (1975); State v. Davalie, La., (1975); State v. Kirklin, La., (1973).
State v. George 346 So. 2d 694 La. 1977
State v. Sims 346 So. 2d 664 La. 1977
State v. Davalie, *668 La., (1975).
State v. Clark 340 So. 2d 1302 La. 1976
State v. Neal, La., (1975); State v. Davalie, La., (1975); State v. St.
State v. Roche 341 So. 2d 348 La. 1976
See State v. Davalie, La., , State v. Kirklin, La., (1973).
State v. Prater 337 So. 2d 1107 La. 1976
State v. Bullock 329 So. 2d 733 La. 1976
State v. Ricks 329 So. 2d 684 La. 1976
State v. Rogers 324 So. 2d 403 La. 1975
State v. Martin 316 So. 2d 740 La. 1975
State v. LeBlanc 315 So. 2d 654 La. 1975