DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nicholson, 315 So. 2d 639.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Dionte Bracken La. 2025
  • State of Louisiana Versus Joachim J. Cotton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State Of Louisiana v. Dionte Bracken La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana Versus Lanard A. Lavigne La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    Collor, 762 So.2d at 104 ( (La.
  • State v. Bell 221 So. 3d 836 La. 2017
    In general, Louisiana courts prohibit the use of an Allen charge, -43 (La.
  • State v. Miller 83 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the authority of a trial court to give further instructions to a jury unable to agree upon a verdict.
  • State v. Foster 44 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Collor , 99-0175 at 13, 762 So.2d at 104 ().
  • State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    -14- This court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [State v.] Nicholson, [ (La.1975) ], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    11fiThis court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [State v.] Nicholson, [ (La.1975) ], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Sumrall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/16/97), : In [State v.] Nicholson, [ (La.1975) ], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State v. Sumrall 34 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/11/96), , writ denied, 97-69 (La.5/16/97), : In [State v.] Nicholson, [ (La.1975) ], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Beaudion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 1992); -44 (La.1975).
  • State v. Beaudion 27 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir.1992); -44 (La.1975).
  • State v. Anders 941 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    This court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [ State v.] Nicholson, [(La.1975)], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State of Louisiana v. Quantell Derell Anders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    This court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [State v.] Nicholson, [(La.1975)], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    This court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [State v.] Nicholson, [(La.1975)], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial 9 judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    This court has discussed Allen charges as follows: In [ State v. ] Nicholson, [(La.1975)], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State v. Dabney 908 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    the trial court gave the jury a modified Allen charge, and the jury ultimately returned a guilty verdict.
  • State v. Eugene 866 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    This court has discussed the Allen issue: In [ State v. ] Nicholson, [(La.1975)], the supreme court set limits to the instructions that a trial judge can give to a jury after the jury announces it cannot reach a verdict.
  • State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    -642 (La.1975), the court held that the tenor of the instructions in that case presented a substantial risk that "a juror or jurors possessed of a genuine conviction that reasonable doubt exists would thereby be coerced into agreement with a majority voting to render a guilty verdict."
  • State v. Collor 762 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Ancar 746 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the Supreme Court recognized the authority of a trial court to give further instructions to a jury unable to agree upon a verdict.
  • State v. Jones 714 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. James 687 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    the supreme court recognized the authority of a trial court to give further instructions to a jury unable to agree upon a verdict.
  • Smith v. Bundrick 663 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    State v. Caston, supra .
  • State v. Washington 646 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    See State v. Canton, 561 So.2d at 942 .
  • State v. Washington 646 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    See State v. Caston, 561 So.2d at 942 .
  • White v. Touro Infirmary 633 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Finally, defendant argues that the trial court erred in giving an "Allen" or "Dynamite" charge to the jury
  • State v. Campbell 606 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    The Louisiana Supreme Court had cause to examine the impact of the "Allen charge"
  • Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. Bank 583 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
  • Trans Global Alloy Ltd. v. First Nat. Bank 564 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Caston 561 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Diggs 489 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Following said move, held that the use of the “Allen” charge or any coercive modification thereof was henceforth banned.
  • State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
  • Bourque v. Olin Corp. 346 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • State v. Schamburge 344 So. 2d 997 La. 1977
    Defendant cites State v. Nicholson, La., (1975), arguing that the judge's comments to the jury require the reversal of his conviction.
  • Distinguished State v. Rudolph 332 So. 2d 806 La. 1976
    as to whether "other jurors felt the deadlock could be broken."
  • State v. Knight 323 So. 2d 765 La. 1975
    He also asserts that the jury, after being deadlocked, was further charged by the judge and asked to continue its deliberations, which resulted in a verdict of "convenience" rather than one based upon the law and evidence, (La.