Harry C. Meyers Co. v. Vasquez
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., September 22, 1976 338 So. 2d 730; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., June 19, 1973 281 So. 2d 145; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 21, 1962 145 So. 2d 62
Harry C. Meyers Co. v. Vasquez, 9 Teiss. 286 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1912).
Opinion text
ST PAUL, J -Appellant has presented neither argument nor brief herein, and we ourselves see nothing erroneous in the judgment appealed from. It will, there1 fore be affirmed. Appellee has asked for damages, but we do not think the appeal frivolous. Technically the plea of res judicata was not well founded, but appellant was justified' nevertheless in having the judgment against him ■ sus1 pended until final action on the other judgment to the end that he might not be condemned twice for the same debt. ... , , Judgment affirmed. With the understanding, however, that but one execution shall issue for the amount here awarded.