DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moreno's, Inc. v. LAKE CHARLES CATHOLIC HIGH SCHS., INC., 315 So. 2d 660.

54 citing documents.

  • Tucker v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 9 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Bell cites Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., for the proposition that a plaintiff may prove the existence of a defect at the time of sale by either direct or indirect evidence.
  • Dailey v. the Home Furnishings Store 857 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir.1978), citing, Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H.S., Inc., (air conditioning compressor which failed after 2.5 years held defective at time of sale).
  • C & M Contractors, Inc. v. Team Persuasion Enterprises, Inc. 779 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Moreno’s, Inc., v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources 635 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.
  • MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    The no-privity-required rule was again applied shortly after Media in Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Dixie Building Material Co. v. Bob L. Whittington & Associates, Inc. 593 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    In Moreno’s, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc., a building owner was sued by a subcontractor for replacement of an air-conditioning compressor.
  • Beth Israel v. Bartley, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic Schools, Inc.
  • Breeden v. Valencia, Inc. 557 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    Id., citing Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.App.
  • Crowell v. City of Alexandria ex rel. Snyder 544 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Moreno ’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Gleason v. City of Shreveport, supra.
  • Truelove v. Easley 521 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High School, Inc., [sic].
  • Morvant v. Himel Marine, Inc. 520 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Fuller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 519 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Gleason v. City of Shreveport, supra.
  • Gitschlag v. US Home Corp. 506 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Newman and Associates, Inc., (La.App.
  • Dreher v. Hood Motor Co., Inc. 492 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    See Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc.
  • Washington v. Morein Motor Co., Inc. 488 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir.1981); Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High School, Inc.
  • Guillory v. Ardoin 491 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    [Citations omitted; emphasis supplied] Moreno’s, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., et al
  • Hidalgo v. Terrell 487 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    The evi-dentiary burden is that the proof must be more probable than not, Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Rasmussen v. Cashio Concrete Corp. 484 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1980), writ denied, Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Dumond v. Houma Toyota, Inc.-AMC Jeep, Inc. 470 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Doughty v. Rainey 465 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Moreno’s, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Schwehm v. Superior Pontiac Co. 463 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    432 (1905); Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (2nd Cir.1979); (5th Cir.1982).
  • Chalmers v. Stephens Chevrolet, Inc. 461 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    See also Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • First Homestead Federal Savings v. Dent 459 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Moreno 's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Company, 101 So.
  • Ezell v. General Motors Corp. 446 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Red Arrow Sales, Inc. v. Dixie Motors, Inc. 442 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Landry v. Baton Rouge Lumber Co. 434 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    [2] Although the agreement between the plaintiff and the contractor was probably a construction contract rather than a contract of sale, the right of subrogation still seems to apply under the facts in Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.
  • Peyton v. Charvet's Garden Center 427 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    We do not deny that, for in Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc., at page 662, the Supreme Court stated that in an action for redhibition: “The burden of proof may, as in cases generally, be discharged by proving the existence of defects or circumstantial evidence.
  • Smith v. HJ Landreneau Bldg. Contractor 426 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    (citations omitted) Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Griffin v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See also Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.App.
  • Saad v. Anderson 416 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    La.Civ.Code art. 2530; Moreno’s, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.App.
  • Prat v. Heymann 410 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    2520, 2521, 2530, Moreno's Inc., v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., .
  • Jofforion v. Leglue Buick, Inc. 399 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    See Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Ewing and Salter, Inc. v. Gafner Automotive & MacHine Inc. 392 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Gleason v. City of Shreveport 393 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Co., 258 La.
  • Newman v. Dixie Sales and Service 387 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Jordan v. Travelers Ins.
  • Sale Electric Supply, Inc. v. Emco Inc. 385 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Carter v. Chrysler Motors Corp. 384 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Moreno’s Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., and the standard to determine the sufficiency of the evidence is ‘when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable *841 than not’.
  • Davidson v. New Roads Motor Co., Inc. 385 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H.S., Inc., and Perrin, supra.
  • Riche v. Krestview Mobile Homes, Inc. 375 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Cangelosi v. McInnis Peterson Chevrolet, Inc. 373 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., Edelman Systems, Inc. v. Capitol GMC, Inc., (La.App.
  • Robertson v. Jimmy Walker Chrysler-Plymouth 368 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc., (La.
  • Fleur De Leis Apts v. DAVIDSON SASH, ETC. 364 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    1974); Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc., White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc., (La.App.
  • Clinkscales v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc. 365 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    [2] Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc., La., ; Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Company, 157 La.
  • Aetna Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Co. 362 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc. 359 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic H. Schs., Inc.
  • Perrin v. Read Imports, Inc. 359 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    1975, (air conditioning compressor which failed after two and a half years held defective at time of sale).
  • Davis v. Davis 353 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
    Louisiana Civil Code Article 2520, 2521; Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc.
  • Cutrer v. Kentwood Motors, Inc. 351 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Proof that the defect existed at the time of the sale can be by either direct or circumstantial evidence giving rise to the reasonable inference that defects existed at the time of the sale, Moreno's Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., and the standard to determine the sufficiency of the evidence is "when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not".
  • Edelman Systems, Inc. v. Capitol GMC, Inc. 345 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Moreno's, Inc. v. Lake Charles Catholic High Schools, Inc., (La.App.
  • Bendana v. Mossy Motors, Inc. 347 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977