Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. Cancienne, 316 So. 2d 366.

22 citing documents.

Arnold Lyle Lewis, Ind. Admin of Succession of Rosalie Hardy Lewis and John Charles Lewis v. Harbor Freight … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Succession of Willie C. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Walls v. American Optical Corp. 740 So. 2d 1262 La. 1999
Nelson v. Burkeen Const. Co. 605 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
The court noted that Article 2315 is not part of the law of successions and *684 that neither the wrongful death action nor the survival action are rights which are transmitted by the tort victim to his heirs as an inheritance, (La.App.
Hellpenstell v. Bonnabel Hosp. 523 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
495 (1851), which rejected the claims in toto, and so skillfully argued by counsel.
Domingue v. Carencro Nursing Home, Inc. 520 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Nathan v. Touro Infirmary 512 So. 2d 352 La. 1987
art. 2315 where we concluded that a putative spouse may maintain the wrongful death action provided for in C.C.
Nathan v. Touro Infirmary 501 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
stands for the proposition that there is no limitation on the classes of individuals who may prosecute a survival action under C.C.
Succession of Langlois v. Noble 465 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In support of this contention, in which a putative spouse was held to be a proper party plaintiff in a wrongful death action based on C.C.
In Re Succession of Gordon 461 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
LaBorde v. Eagle Trucking Co. 409 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Holcomb v. Kincaid 406 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
In Re Koonce 380 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Roche v. Big Moose Oil Field Truck Service 381 So. 2d 396 La. 1980
we held that a putative *403 spouse would not be deprived of recovery under 2315 for the wrongful death of her putative husband even though she did not technically fit within any of the categories of 2315.
Braxton v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Guidry v. Theriot 371 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Branch v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 370 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
the Supreme Court of Louisiana exhaustively reviewed the source provisions of this article.
Roundtree v. Technical Welding & Fabrication Co. 364 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Clark v. Tenneco, Inc. 353 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Similarly, the Supreme Court interpreted article 2315 in conjunction with La.Civ.Code arts.
Simmons v. Brooks 342 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
In King v. Cancienne, La., (1975), the Supreme Court interpreted Article 2315 in conjunction with LSA-R.C.C.
Wilder v. Thrower 337 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
art. 2315; King v. Cancienne, La., ; (La.App.
Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 692 La. 1976
L. Oppenheim, The Survival of Tort Actions and the Action for Wrongful Death A Survey and a Proposal, 16 Tul.L.R.