Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 319 So. 2d 766.
- Chaney v. State Mineral Bd. 444 So. 2d 105 La. 1983
- Mire v. Crowe 439 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Harvey v. Harvey 431 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Whitley v. Texaco, Inc.
434 So. 2d 96
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, (La.App.
- Towles v. Heirs of Morrison 428 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Natural Resources
422 So. 2d 1353
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
La.Civil Code Art. 3449; 3 Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company
-
Meche v. Graham
421 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration
-
Hawthorne v. Succession of Hawthorne
419 So. 2d 1295
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, Hill v. Richey, 221 La.
-
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
412 So. 2d 975
La. 1982
plaintiff had trapped and burned the marsh yearly, marked boundaries with stakes, raised cattle and actively prevented dispossession by the defendant.
-
Alvarez v. Hub City Iron Works, Inc.
405 So. 2d 590
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1965); (La.App.
- Champagne v. Broussard 401 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Self v. Hutton 395 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Seven Water Holes Corp. v. Spires
393 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Further, : "Our Civil Code provisions make it clear that one who has acquired corporeal possession continues in possession until he transfers it or abandons it, or until another expels him from it, or until he permits the estate to be usurped and held for a year without doing any act of possession or without interferi
-
McPherson v. Roy
390 So. 2d 543
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company
- Ryan v. Pekinto 387 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Ryan v. Pekinto 387 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Ferguson v. Gunther
385 So. 2d 876
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, (La.App.
- Jones v. Skannal 384 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
- Pitre v. Tenneco Oil Co. 385 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Harper v. Willis
383 So. 2d 1299
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
2nd Cir. 1961); Case v. Jeanerette *1307 Lumber & Shingle Company, Inc.
-
August v. Hamilton
381 So. 2d 961
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
See also Liner v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Company, (La.App.
- Plaisance v. Collins 365 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
-
Holleyman v. Garbarino
358 So. 2d 365
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
our Supreme Court reviewed the jurisprudence as to what constitutes corporeal possession of different types of land, such as agricultural land, wood land, swamp land, etc. I mention this only to make the point that our jurisprudence has established clearly the meaning of the term "corporeal possession"
- Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter Foundation 354 So. 2d 156 La. 1977
- Holliday v. Continental Can Co., Inc. 351 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
- Wagley v. Cross 347 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Parkway Development Corp. v. City of Shreveport 342 So. 2d 151 La. 1977
- Norton v. Addie 337 So. 2d 432 La. 1976
- Olinkraft, Incorporated v. Allen 333 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976