Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ray v. South Central Bell Tel. Co., 315 So. 2d 759.
- State of Louisiana v. $1330.00 in U.S. Currency (Reference: Robert Mincey) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan
53 So. 3d 492
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., Jurisich v. Jenkins, 99-76, p. 6 (La.10/19/99), .
- Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
- Carter v. Duhe 921 So. 2d 963 La. 2006
- State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. Perdue v. Langlois 874 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- STATE EX REL. DEP. OF SOC. SER. v. Langlois 874 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Spomer v. Aggressor Intern., Inc. 807 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Jurado v. Brashear 764 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
- In Re Succession of Boyter 756 So. 2d 1122 La. 2000
- Jurisich v. Jenkins 749 So. 2d 597 La. 1999
- Rando v. Rando 722 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- Dean v. Waters 667 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
State v. $1,480.00 in United States Currency
637 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
[The Anthony court held that actual notice was not required in bond forfeitures under R.S.
- Warren v. McNair 622 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Consolidated Resources, Inc. v. Siess
613 So. 2d 163
La. 1993
which held that service on an appointed attorney in an action under the long-arm statute (instead of the type of service provided in the statute) was insufficient to support a judgment against the nonresident defendant, the court of appeal held that the appointed attorney’s answer was without effect.
- Consolidated Resources, Inc. v. Siess 607 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Orleans Levee District v. Glenn 577 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Brasseaux v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COMM'N 577 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Barber v. Profit 576 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Owens 561 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Fox v. Board of Supervisors
559 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 5053, in pertinent part, provides that “[t]he word ‘shall’ is mandatory, and the word ‘may’ is permissive.” D’ (La.App.
- Hinchman v. Oubre 539 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Anthony 525 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- D'AGOSTINO v. City of Baton Rouge 504 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Eiswirth v. Eiswirth 500 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Decca Leasing Corp. v. Torres 465 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State, Through Dept. of Health v. King
447 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
where personal jurisdiction is based upon the Long Arm Statute, a valid service may only be made by certified mail under R.S.
-
Clay v. Clay
389 So. 2d 31
La. 1980
As we stated as recently as 1975 "The word shall in R.S.
- O'Bryan v. O'Bryan 391 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
DLJ of Louisiana No. 1 v. Green Thumb, Inc.
376 So. 2d 121
La. 1979
this court was faced with a situation in which the plaintiff in the nullity action when threatened with the sale of his property had agreed to pay and had paid installments on default judgment both before and during the action for nullity.
- Caffery v. Burns 351 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Tatum v. Ridgeway Properties
348 So. 2d 1323
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Bell v. Fiat Distributors, Inc., (La.App.
-
Bickford v. Lutz
339 So. 2d 1268
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
1st Cir. 1974), affirmed, (1975).
-
Gennuso v. State
339 So. 2d 335
La. 1976
[8] wherein this court held that under the peculiar facts of that case payments made on an invalid judgment in order to prevent the seizure of personal property under a writ of execution issued did not constitute voluntary acquiescence barring suit to annul judgment filed within eleven weeks after payments began
-
Kachelmyer v. Ames
335 So. 2d 525
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Ray v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, La., (1975); Boykin v. Lindenkranar, La.App., (4th Cir. 1971).