Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kavlich v. Kramer, 315 So. 2d 282.

140 citing documents.

McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 511 So. 2d 1134 La. 1987
Brown v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 509 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
: "Self-service grocery stores require customers to look for and to find the objects which they wish to purchase.
Bonnette v. K-Mart, Inc. 502 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Kavlich v. Kramer, La., (1975); Tripkovich v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., (1973); Fontanille v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., La.App.
Walden v. PAT GOINS BENTON RD. BEAUTY SCHOOL 501 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Deville v. K-Mart Corp. 498 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Nettles v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 496 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Arnold, 466 So.2d at 532 .
Saucier v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Arnold, 466 So.2d at 532 .
McCargar v. Babin Motors, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
The jury was instructed to apply the slip and fall negligence standard as set forth by the *1083 and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Lee v. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. 493 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Davis v. Winningham Datsun-Volvo, Inc. 493 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Taylor v. Kroger Co., Inc., (La.
Lambert v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 490 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Kavlich v. Kramer, La., (1975); Tripkovich v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., La.App., (1973); Fontanille v. WinnDixie Louisiana, Inc., La.App., (1972), cert.
Scott v. Hosp. Service Dist. No. 1 484 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Carollo v. Shoney's Big Boy Enterprises, Inc ., ibid
Batiste v. Joyce's Supermarket 488 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
685 (La.1984); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 489 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Schexnider v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 490 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Brown v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Sierra v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 487 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Kavlich v. Kramer, La., (1975); Tripkovich v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., La.App.
Lee v. K-Mart Corp. 483 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and Gonzales, 326 So.2d at 488 , and are correct statements of the law applicable in "slip and fall" cases.
Hull v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 480 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., the injured victim could recover from the store operator only by proving the store operator or his employee caused the hazard and failed to take reasonable steps to remove the hazard.
Edmond v. Market Basket Stores, Inc. 479 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
In his written reasons for judgment dated June 15, 1984
Arch v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA CO., INC. 477 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Kavlich v. Kramer, La., (1975); Tripkovich v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., La.App.
Rose v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 474 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
A large spread of oil with large pieces of broken glass on the floor before the accident is a pre-existing hazard, in the sense of Johnson and of Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Core v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 471 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Arnold v. TG & Y. STORES CO. 466 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1980), writ denied
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 452 So. 2d 685 La. 1984
and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., a tort victim injured by a fall in a supermarket caused by a foreign substance on the floor could recover only by proving that the store operator or his employee caused the hazard, or that the operator had actual or constructive knowledge
Thompson v. TG & Y Stores Co. 448 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Kramer v. Denny's Inc. of California 449 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Baldwin v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets 449 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Smith v. Winn-Dixie Stores of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Van Lieu v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana 446 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Rollings v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 439 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Smith v. Winn Dixie Store of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
Berry v. City of Monroe 439 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Weaver v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc., *467 (La.App.
McCarter v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 436 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Jackson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 436 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Dulaney v. Travelers Ins. Co. 434 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Robinson v. Gulf Ins. Co. 434 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Carriere v. Olivier 432 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Inc., La.1976, ; Kavlich v. Kramer, La.1975, .
Carollo v. Shoney's Big Boy Enterprises 433 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
(La.1975); Hanzo v. Travelers Ins.
Smith v. Reliance Ins. Co. 431 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Brown v. McDonald's Corp. 428 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Gonzales v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
McGuire v. National Super Markets, Inc. 425 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
(La.1975); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 * Hanzo v. Travelers Ins.
Gums v. Delta Downs, Inc. 425 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
and Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc., in support her contention.
Kinchen v. JC Penney Co., Inc. 426 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1978); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Ruffin v. Trapp Chevrolet Inc. 424 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
Robinson v. FW Woolworth Co. 420 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Weaver v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 406 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
As part of the general duty to keep aisles, passageways and floors in safe condition, there is a duty upon a self-service store that places mats at its entrance, owed to patrons entering with shopping carts, to have a mat that lies flat (even as many patrons and carts pass over it) so that a patron’s foot will not catch under some rise in the mat, causing him or her to fall.
Peralta v. Schwegmann Bros. Gt. Supermkts 406 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Gonzales v. Winn Dixie Stores of La., Inc., Hanzo v. Travelers Ins.
West v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 405 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
4th Cir. 1976), a case much like the instant case in which the principles laid down in Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie, Louisiana, Inc., were applied.
Rodriguez v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. 400 So. 2d 884 La. 1981
Rigney v. Howard Bros. Discount Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Edwards v. Piggly Wiggly Operators 401 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
It is axiomatic that a storekeeper owes an affirmative duty to those who use his premises to exercise reasonable care to keep his floors in a safe condition
Mercadel v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 399 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The short length of time transpiring between the spill and the fall was not such as to call into play defendant’s (1976), (1975) and other cases.
Watson v. West Bros. of Ville Platte, Inc. 399 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Co. of North America, stated: "Our opinions in Kavlich [ v. Kramer, ] and Gonzales [ v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana Inc., ] shift the burden of proof to a store operator after a plaintiff has shown that a premise hazard caused his injury.