Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Webster v. Rushing, 316 So. 2d 111.

82 citing documents.

Pedestal Bank v. Castaways Oyster Bar & Seafood Grill, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
is that pleadings may be enlarged by evidence adduced without objection when such evidence is not pertinent to any other issue raised by the pleadings and, hence, would have been excluded if objected to timely.” Our review of the record shows that whenever the defendants attempted to adduce testi
Kristin Usner Norton Versus Taylor Montgomery Norton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Abadie, 710 So.2d at 332; -CA-212 20 (La.
Catherine J. Estis, Samuel C. Estis, and Thuy P. Estis v. Clifton L. Mills, Kimberly M. Mills, Twin … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
William Terry Ebarb and Dewanna N. Ebarb v. Unopened Succ. of Alfair Jones Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Keller, 512 So.2d at 387
Norman Michael Sepulvado v. William Terry Ebarb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Keller, 512 So.2d at 387
Ebarb v. Unopened Succession Sepulvado 241 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Keller , 512 So.2d at 387 ; , 114 (La.1975).
Draughn Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/25/08), : “An affirmative defense raises new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action and will have the effect of defeating plaintiff’s demand on its merits.” 12
Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 172 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 1/30/08), , writ denied, 08-0504 (La.4/25/08), : “An affirmative defense raises new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action and will have the effect of defeating plaintiffs demand on its merits.”
Woodlands Development, L.L.C. v. Regions Bank 141 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In explaining Article 1005’s omnibus recital clause, the Louisiana Supreme Court has stated, “[A]n affirmative defense raises new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action and will have the effect of defeating plaintiffs demand on its merits.”
Bates v. City of New Orleans 137 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 5/23/01), ; n. 8 (La.1975) (noting that “Black’s Law Dictionary Fourth Edition, defines ‘affirmative defense’ as: ‘New matter constituting a defense; new matter Inwhich, assuming the complaint to be true, constitutes a defense to it.’ ”) “Implicit in that definition is the conclusion that a defendant is not required to rais
Kenneth James Mouton v. Hebert's Superette, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 and will have the effect of defeating plaintiff’s demand on its merits.” (footnote omitted).
Mouton v. Hebert's Superette, Inc. 53 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“An affirmative defense raises [a] new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action Land will have the effect of defeating *564 plaintiffs demand on its merits.” (footnote omitted).
Jalou II, Inc. v. Liner 43 So. 3d 1023 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Fishbein v. State ex rel.
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-15 (La.1975); Maraist & Lemmon, 1 La.
Ella Rogers v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“An affirmative defense raises new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action and will have the effect of defeating plaintiff’s demand on its merits.”
Rogers v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 974 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
“An affirmative defense raises new matter which, assuming the allegations in the petition to be true, constitutes a defense to the action and will have the effect of defeating plaintiffs demand on its merits.”
Alexander v. Cornett 961 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Keller, supra at 387 ; Wimberly, supra .
Fishbein v. State 960 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Buck's Run Enterprises, Inc. v. Mapp Const., Inc., 99-3054, p. 4 (La.App.
Yates v. Elmer 948 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See: Webster v. Rushing -115 (La.1975).
Roussell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 943 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Costello v. Hardy 864 So. 2d 129 La. 2004
Succession of Granger v. Worthington 829 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Wimberly v. McCoy Tree Surgery Co. 766 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Campbell v. Elcom of Louisiana, Inc., 31,693 (La.
Caldwell Wholesale Co. v. Central Oil & Supply Corp. 761 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
art. 1154; Cooper v. Borden, Inc., 30,-292 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/98), ; (La.App.
American Gulf V, Inc. v. Hibernia Nat. Bank 749 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Fitzgerald v. Tucker 737 So. 2d 706 La. 1999
art. 1154; -95 (La.1991); , 114-15 & n. 10 (La.1975); Cooper v. Borden, 30,292 (La.
Harris v. Cola 732 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
is that pleadings may be enlarged by evidence adduced without objection when such evidence is not pertinent to any other issue raised by the pleadings and, hence, would have been excluded if objected to timely.
Douglas v. Thomas 728 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
(1975); Cooper v. Borden, Inc., 30,292 (La.
Campbell v. Elcom of Louisiana, Inc. 728 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Leger v. Coccaro 714 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Abadie v. Markey 710 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
App. 1 Cir.1992); (La.App.
Cooper v. Borden, Inc. 709 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Shrader v. Life General Sec.
Remet v. Martin 705 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Albarado v. Abadie 703 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Brewster v. Santos 646 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Sebastien v. McKay 649 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Hanks v. Wilson 633 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Salter v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Salter v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Hogan v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 607 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Kelly v. Kelly 596 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Shrader v. Life General SEC. Ins. Co. 588 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Lee v. New England Ins. Co. 579 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Roberson v. Provident House 576 So. 2d 992 La. 1991
is that pleadings may be enlarged by evidence adduced without objection when such evidence is not pertinent to any other issue raised by the pleadings and, hence, would have been excluded if objected to timely.
Fragala v. City of Rayville 557 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Bonnett v. Mize 556 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Nichols v. Stone Container Corp. 552 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Blackledge v. Vinet 543 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hagberg v. Manuel 525 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Moran v. Wilshire Ins. Co. 520 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988