Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brady, 310 So. 2d 593.
-
State v. Smalls
48 So. 3d 212
La. 2010
This fact was made clear by the court’s which addressed an en banc rule adopted by the judges of the Criminal District Court on December 9, 1974, authorizing the magistrate judge to try misdemeanor cases allotted for that purpose to the Magistrate Section of court.
-
In Re Matter Under Investigation
15 So. 3d 972
La. 2009
For two cases which discuss and apply this provision, (La.App.
- State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Pleasant 489 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Exotic Feline Survival Ass'n v. City of Hammond 479 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Spragio v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMP. GROUP BENEFITS PROGRAM 468 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Jackson
439 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 17; [La.1975]), it would appear that sentencing errors adverse to either the state or the defendant could be recognized by an appellate court on its own motion.
- Dumas v. Jetson 446 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Thomas v. Department of Corrections 430 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Evans v. Evans 410 So. 2d 729 La. 1982
-
State v. Turner
389 So. 2d 714
La. 1980
In response to this Court’s (La.
-
State v. Lollar
389 So. 2d 1315
La. 1980
14:39; State v. Seals, 255 La.
-
State v. Page
332 So. 2d 427
La. 1976
For two cases which discuss and apply this provision, writs refused, .